Category talk:Diamond Quality Pages

All of the pages here are wrongly categoriesed

All of the pages supposedly that are diamond quality should NOT be there, as throughout there life they have been worked on by a single player, whereas it specifically states that diamond quality pages should be worked on by multiple people, and that One off edits do NOT count In my opinion the only page that could have a chance of being diamond is music's gems, but even then, the only reason that page has multiple editors is cuz music got banned and kitty took over. All yoshi's pages should be gold, and gold ONLY. Currently I feel that they're put here to grab attention which i find abit selfish. And I request that they be moved back to the category where they should be. RLcrafters (talk) 03:27, 26 October 2015 (EDT)

This is about the quality of the page, not how it was made. If you see a beautiful building in Minecraft, you don't base your opinion about it on the amount of players who built it. It doesn't make any sense. These pages do deserve diamond quality because they have been worked on extensively and the results show that effort. KittyCat11231 is behind you right now. Look. I dare you. (talk) 08:41, 26 October 2015 (EDT)

I'm simply going by what the regulations say. RLcrafters (talk) 09:11, 26 October 2015 (EDT)

I think both of you have a point, my suggestion is to abolish multtple editors rule._Ardy - THIS SIGNATURE IS SPONSORED BY VANADIUM SYSTEMS (talk) 09:42, 26 October 2015 (EDT)

Agreed. KittyCat11231 is behind you right now. Look. I dare you. (talk) 11:52, 26 October 2015 (EDT)

Im sure they are a guide and do not have to be sticked to 100%. Yes it does say that the pages are worked on by multiple users but it doesn't take multiple members to create a really good, informative, quality page. User:Technological99 (talk)

Oh and by the way, it now appears that almost half of the pages aren't rated. How about trying to go rate these after we settle this discussion?--_Ardy - THIS SIGNATURE IS SPONSORED BY VANADIUM SYSTEMS (talk) 13:51, 26 October 2015 (EDT)

I may go on a rating spree later this evening then :p ~ Technological99 (talk) 15:06, 26 October 2015 (EDT)