League of Cities/Resolutions/Archive

This page showcases all past Resolutions from the League of Cities

Resolution 1  Passed 

Replacing frankbros429 As League of Cities Transit Commissioner  PASSED 
This resolution was started to replace frankbros429 as the transit commissioner for the League of Cities, due to concerns that he was not qualified for the position. It was started by KittyCat11231, the deputy secretariat of the LoC as well as representative of the City-State of Kitania.

Votes Needed To Pass: 10

Votes

In Favor  -  11 1/2 TOTAL
City-State of Kitania
Formosa
Arctic Plains SMP
Laclede Shared Municipality
Royalston
Wythern
Kenthurst
Armada
Elecna Bay (1/2 Vote)
Seaview
Saint Roux
Accerton

Against  -  1 TOTAL
Sealane

Did Not Vote  -  5 1/2 TOTAL
Brunswick
Beaufort
Birchwood Lake City
Whiteley
Whitechapel (1/2 Vote)
Lancaster

Outcome

frankbros429 will be removed from office as soon as a new TC is elected. A LoC session may be held soon, partly to discuss this.

Resolution 2  Finished 

This resolution is a follow up to the previous one. It is to appoint a new TC, to replace the current one. The new TC will be voted in by a majority. Nominations, including self-, accepted from anyone Trustee and above. The end date for voting has not been decided yet; it will likely be before a future GA meeting.

Nominations:

Nominee	# of votes
RLcrafters	13
_frozen	12

City	Representative	Vote
Formosa	camelfantasy	RLcrafters
Brunswick	_hnt	RLcrafters
Arctic Plains SMP	sesese9	RLcrafters
Lacledic Republic	jphgolf4321	_frozen
Beaufort	frankbros429	_frozen
Birchwood Lake City	PresidentQwerty	RLcrafters
Armada	Ardyan	_frozen
Kenthurst	AlikSong	RLcrafters
Whiteley	AP_Red	RLcrafters
City-State of Kitania	KittyCat11231	_frozen
Sealane	RLcrafters	_frozen
Accerton	CaptainChimpy	_frozen
Mallison	jamess2912	RLcrafters
Elecna Bay	mine_man_	RLcrafters
Whitechapel	_frozen	RLcrafters
Seaview	_Redneck_Jesus_	_frozen
Saint Roux	Just_robinho	Abstain
Wythern	Baseball02	_frozen
Siletz	MeetMeInSpace	RLcrafters
Mason City	kiwirainbow	Abstain
Grayzen (O)	cardinalland	RLcrafters
Royal Ferry	MIKE24DUDE	RLcrafters
Janghwa City	HanSangYoon	_frozen
Astoria	TonyTajiri	_frozen
Snowtopic	Duechayapol	_frozen
Xilia (O)	Yellowitcher	RLcrafters
Ellesume	allifarki	RLcrafters
Utopia	Narnia17	_frozen
New Phoenix	_MajorMagpie_
Storalisburg	Vulpicula
Ezzo City	ezzocraft
Espil	_InDev_
Vermilion	chiefbozx
Woodsdale	Hightech_TR
Spruce Plains	shadowboarder
Waterville	PtldKnight
Liten	Gopher
City of Evella	LDShadowLord
Konawa	Soleurs
Loudoun	DullesTdt
Royal Plaza	KevinTheLlama
Newton-le-Willows	Patrick44_LFC
Airchester	CortesiRaccoon
Mecklenburg	tarheelscouse
Kelvinside	Martii_Scots01
Haibian	cookiesareedible
Pearl Coast	knowmads7
Amestris	MRTKeikoku
Segville	godzilltrain
Spring Valley (O)	Architect_21
Helix Bay	TrainPro
Radiance Square	MindBender15
42	Leo_2807
Numark	bryce_am
New Covina	_Kastle
Scoton	MrDynamo_
Kolpino City	MishkaMan
Iconia	EchoRyuko
Avalon	Member_Me
Wolf Peak	bnsjninja
Wellington	JohnNotTech
Spruce Neck	Derpy_Melon
AEville	AEhub
Rochshire	MC_Protocol

Outcome

RLcrafters is the new transit commissioner effective immediately.

Resolution 3  Finished 

Nominees for SAC:

17.5 votes for immediate win.

Nominee	Votes
Sesese9	7
MajorMagpie
AlikSong	10.5
AP_Rednax	5

City	Representative	Vote
Formosa	camelfantasy	Sesese9
Brunswick	_hnt
Arctic Plains SMP	sesese9
Lacledic Republic	jphgolf4321	AlikSong
Beaufort	frankbros429	AlikSong
Birchwood Lake City	PresidentQwerty
Armada	Ardyan
Kenthurst	AlikSong	AP_Rednax
Whiteley	AP_Red	AlikSong
City-State of Kitania	KittyCat11231	AlikSong
Sealane	RLcrafters	AlikSong
Accerton	CaptainChimpy	Sesese9
Mallison	jamess2912
Elecna Bay	mine_man_	AP_Rednax
Whitechapel	_frozen	Sesese9
Seaview	_Redneck_Jesus_
Saint Roux	Just_robinho
Wythern	Baseball02	AP_Rednax
Siletz	MeetMeInSpace	AlikSong
Mason City	kiwirainbow	AP_Rednax
Grayzen (O)	cardinalland	AlikSong
Royal Ferry	MIKE24DUDE	Sesese9
Janghwa City	HanSangYoon	Sesese9
Astoria	TonyTajiri	AlikSong
Snowtopic	Duechayapol
Xilia (O)	Yellowitcher
Ellesume	allifarki	AlikSong
Utopia	Narnia17	Sesese9
New Phoenix	_MajorMagpie_
Storalisburg	Vulpicula
Ezzo City	ezzocraft	AlikSong
Espil	_InDev_	AlikSong
Vermilion	chiefbozx
Woodsdale	Hightech_TR
Spruce Plains	shadowboarder
Waterville	PtldKnight	Sesese9
Liten	Gopher	AP_Rednax
City of Evella	LDShadowLord
Konawa	Soleurs
Loudoun	DullesTdt
Royal Plaza	KevinTheLlama
Newton-le-Willows	Patrick44_LFC
Airchester	CortesiRaccoon
Mecklenburg	tarheelscouse
Kelvinside	Martii_Scots01
Haibian	cookiesareedible
Pearl Coast	knowmads7
Amestris	MRTKeikoku
Segville	godzilltrain
Spring Valley (O)	Architect_21
Helix Bay	TrainPro
Radiance Square	MindBender15
42	Leo_2807
Numark	bryce_am
New Covina	_Kastle
Scoton	MrDynamo_
Kolpino City	MishkaMan
Iconia	EchoRyuko
Avalon	Member_Me
Wolf Peak	bnsjninja
Wellington	JohnNotTech
Spruce Neck	Derpy_Melon
AEville	AEhub
Rochshire	MC_Protocol

Outome

AlikSong is the new Supreme Allied Commander.

Resolution 4  Finished 

Nominees for Head of Intelligence Agency:

18.5 votes for immediate win.

Nominee	Votes
_Redneck_Jesus_
MIKE24DUDE
_MajorMagpie_
KittyCat11231	17.5

City	Representative	Vote
Formosa	camelfantasy	KittyCat11231
Brunswick	_hnt
Arctic Plains SMP	sesese9
Lacledic Republic	jphgolf4321	KittyCat11231
Beaufort	frankbros429
Birchwood Lake City	PresidentQwerty
Armada	Ardyan	KittyCat11231
Kenthurst	AlikSong	KittyCat11231
Whiteley	AP_Red	KittyCat11231
City-State of Kitania	KittyCat11231
Sealane	RLcrafters	KittyCat11231
Accerton	CaptainChimpy	KittyCat11231
Mallison	jamess2912
Elecna Bay	mine_man_	KittyCat11231
Whitechapel	_frozen
Seaview	_Redneck_Jesus_
Saint Roux	Just_robinho
Wythern	Baseball02	KittyCat11231
Siletz	MeetMeInSpace	KittyCat11231
Mason City	kiwirainbow	KittyCat11231
Grayzen (O)	cardinalland	KittyCat11231
Royal Ferry	MIKE24DUDE
Janghwa City	HanSangYoon	KittyCat11231
Astoria	TonyTajiri	KittyCat11231
Snowtopic	Duechayapol
Xilia (O)	Yellowitcher
Ellesume	allifarki	KittyCat11231
Utopia	Narnia17	KittyCat11231
New Phoenix	_MajorMagpie_
Storalisburg	Vulpicula
Ezzo City	ezzocraft	KittyCat11231
Espil	_InDev_	KittyCat11231
Vermilion	chiefbozx
Woodsdale	Hightech_TR
Spruce Plains	shadowboarder
Waterville	PtldKnight
Liten	Gopher
City of Evella	LDShadowLord
Konawa	Soleurs
Loudoun	DullesTdt
Royal Plaza	KevinTheLlama
Newton-le-Willows	Patrick44_LFC
Airchester	CortesiRaccoon
Mecklenburg	tarheelscouse
Kelvinside	Martii_Scots01
Haibian	cookiesareedible
Pearl Coast	knowmads7
Amestris	MRTKeikoku
Segville	godzilltrain
Spring Valley (O)	Architect_21
Helix Bay	TrainPro
Radiance Square	MindBender15
42	Leo_2807
Numark	bryce_am
New Covina	_Kastle
Scoton	MrDynamo_
Kolpino City	MishkaMan
Iconia	EchoRyuko
Avalon	Member_Me
Wolf Peak	bnsjninja
Wellington	JohnNotTech
Spruce Neck	Derpy_Melon
AEville	AEhub
Rochshire	MC_Protocol

Outome

KittyCat11231 is the new Head of Intelligence Agency

Resolution 5  Passed 

Change in voting procedure (text taken directly from resolution form). 15.5 votes for a resolution needed to pass that one.

5.1: The final vote in the event of a tie be given to the Secretariat, who is essentially the Leader of the LoC. It would allow someone who's higher up on the ladder of the LoC to help make the call in the event of a tie.

5.2: A General Assembly Chief shall not cast his or her vote unless it is needed to break ties, as is it his duty. He or She must keep the intended vote confidential to not sway votes one way or another.

5.3: A General Assembly Vote shall not last more than 2 weeks.

Voting like this: yes/no, yes/no, yes/no

Resolution	Yes	No	Status
1	16.5	3	PASSED
2	16	3.5	PASSED
3	19.5	0	PASSED

City	Representative	Vote
Formosa	camelfantasy	1. No 2. Yes 3. Yes
Brunswick	_hnt	1. Yes 2. No 3. Yes
Arctic Plains SMP	sesese9
Lacledic Republic	jphgolf4321	1. Yes 2. Yes 3. Yes
Beaufort	frankbros429
Birchwood Lake City	PresidentQwerty
Armada	Ardyan	1. and 2. Yes w/changes 1 3 Yes
Kenthurst	AlikSong	1. Yes 2. Yes w/changes 2 3. Yes
Whiteley	AP_Red	1. Yes 2. Yes 3. Yes
City-State of Kitania	KittyCat11231	1. Yes 2. No 3. Yes
Sealane	RLcrafters	1. Yes 2. Yes 3. Yes
Accerton	CaptainChimpy	1. Yes 2. Yes 3. Yes w/changes 3
Mallison	jamess2912	1. No 2. Yes 3. Yes
Elecna Bay	mine_man_	1. Yes 2. Yes 3. Yes
Whitechapel	_frozen	1. Yes 2. Yes 3. Yes
Seaview	_Redneck_Jesus_
Saint Roux	Just_robinho
Wythern	Baseball02	1. Yes 2. Yes 3. Yes
Siletz	MeetMeInSpace	1. Yes 2. Yes 3. Yes
Mason City	kiwirainbow	1. No 2. Yes 3. Yes
Grayzen (O)	cardinalland	1. Yes 2. No 3. Yes
Royal Ferry	MIKE24DUDE	1. Yes 2. Yes 3. Yes
Janghwa City	HanSangYoon	1. Yes 2. No4 3. Yes
Astoria	TonyTajiri
Snowtopic	Duechayapol	1. Yes 2. Yes 3. Yes
Xilia (O)	Yellowitcher
Ellesume	allifarki
Utopia	Narnia17	1. Yes 2. Yes 3. Yes
New Phoenix	_MajorMagpie_
Storalisburg	Vulpicula
Ezzo City	ezzocraft
Espil	_InDev_
Vermilion	chiefbozx
Woodsdale	Hightech_TR
Spruce Plains	shadowboarder
Waterville	PtldKnight
Liten	Gopher
City of Evella	LDShadowLord
Konawa	Soleurs
Loudoun	DullesTdt
Royal Plaza	KevinTheLlama
Newton-le-Willows	Patrick44_LFC
Airchester	CortesiRaccoon
Mecklenburg	tarheelscouse
Kelvinside	Martii_Scots01
Haibian	cookiesareedible
Pearl Coast	knowmads7
Amestris	MRTKeikoku
Segville	godzilltrain
Spring Valley (O)	Architect_21
Helix Bay	TrainPro
Radiance Square	MindBender15
42	Leo_2807
Numark	bryce_am
New Covina	_Kastle
Scoton	MrDynamo_
Kolpino City	MishkaMan
Iconia	EchoRyuko
Avalon	Member_Me
Wolf Peak	bnsjninja
Wellington	JohnNotTech
Spruce Neck	Derpy_Melon
AEville	AEhub
Rochshire	MC_Protocol

Member Notes:

¹ I suggest having a final showdown between the 2 candidates before letting Secretariat or GA voting, as we are doing right now. If the final showdown doesn't help the tie broken either, then they should vote.

² Note: Alik (Chief Justice) is doubtful of Proposed Rule 2. Does this mean JamesGaming cannot vote at all? I would suggest completely removing the tie vote power from the General Assembly Chief, and give it solely to the Secretariat (as per Rule 1).

³ In the event of a tie, where all member cities have not voted, or voted for somebody else that has been ruled out of the final showdown (see Note 1), I suggest an extra week to let these cities vote. Then if this results in another tie, we hand over to the Secreteriat (as per rule 1).

⁴ Janghwa City lacks support for the second rule, as it bluntly singles out JamesGaming from majority of voting events. Furthermore, on the claim that a single-person decision may not affect of a consensual vote like the LoC resolutions, where this really affects are the percentage-then-decision situations. If there are two sets of votings for example, and the second voting poll's choices are dependent by the first votes, then tiebreakers aren't really a thing, yet with further prohibition of even a single player can cause inaccuracies, and eliminate choices that could have been saved if JamesGaming were to vote.

Leaders' Thoughts on the Member Notes

¹ There should be a final election in case of tie in primary election. Tied candidates go to final in case of tie. If another tie results, S or GA then votes.

² Tie breaker vote given to Secretariat, instead of GA.

³ Extra week given in case of tie and a needed final election. Basically concurs with Note 1.

Outcome

(Resolution 5.1) The Secretariat is granted the tie-breaker vote.

(Resolution 5.2) Tie Vote will be confidential and given after all other voting has finished.

(Resolution 5.3) Cities will have 2 weeks to vote on resolutions, with an additional week given in event of additional voting.

Changes effective immediately.

Resolution 6  Passed 

One Officer Position per Person

If this resolution is passed, one person may not hold more than one officer or leader position at one given time.

Vote either In Favor or Against.

Vote	# of votes
In Favor	15
Against	13.5

City	Representative	Vote
Formosa	camelfantasy	Against 2
Brunswick	_hnt	In Favor
Arctic Plains SMP	sesese9	Against
Lacledic Republic	jphgolf4321	Against 1
Beaufort	frankbros429
Birchwood Lake City	PresidentQwerty
Armada	Ardyan	In favor
Kenthurst	AlikSong	Against
Whiteley	AP_Red	Against
City-State of Kitania	KittyCat11231	Against
Sealane	RLcrafters	Against
Accerton	CaptainChimpy	In Favour
Mallison	jamess2912	Against
Elecna Bay	mine_man_	Against 3
Whitechapel	_frozen
Seaview	_Redneck_Jesus_
Saint Roux	Just_robinho
Wythern	Baseball02	In Favor
Siletz	MeetMeInSpace	In Favor
Mason City	kiwirainbow
Grayzen (O)	cardinalland	Against
Royal Ferry	MIKE24DUDE	In Favor
Janghwa City	HanSangYoon	In Favor
Astoria	TonyTajiri	Against
Snowtopic	Duechayapol	In Favor
Xilia (O)	Yellowitcher
Ellesume	allifarki	Against
Utopia	Narnia17	In Favor
New Phoenix	_MajorMagpie_
Storalisburg	Vulpicula	In Favor
Ezzo City	ezzocraft	In Favor
Espil	_InDev_	Against
Vermilion	chiefbozx	In Favor
Woodsdale	Hightech_TR
Spruce Plains	shadowboarder
Waterville	PtldKnight	In Favor
Liten	Gopher	In Favor
City of Evella	LDShadowLord
Konawa	Soleurs
Loudoun	DullesTdt	In Favor
Royal Plaza	KevinTheLlama
Newton-le-Willows	Patrick44_LFC
Airchester	CortesiRaccoon
Mecklenburg	tarheelscouse
Kelvinside	Martii_Scots01	Against
Haibian	cookiesareedible
Pearl Coast	knowmads7
Amestris	MRTKeikoku
Segville	godzilltrain
Spring Valley (O)	Architect_21
Helix Bay	TrainPro
Radiance Square	MindBender15
42	Leo_2807
Numark	bryce_am
New Covina	_Kastle
Scoton	MrDynamo_
Kolpino City	MishkaMan
Iconia	EchoRyuko
Avalon	Member_Me
Wolf Peak	bnsjninja
Wellington	JohnNotTech
Spruce Neck	Derpy_Melon
AEville	AEhub
Rochshire	MC_Protocol

Note: Regardless of the result, KittyCat111231 and AlikSong will keep all their positions as this resolution was proposed after their appointments.

¹I think instead of saying only one, we limit it to three or four. There are so many potential offices to hold it doesn't make sense to elect a different person for every single one and then there's also IRL stuff, activity issues, etc. jphgolf4321 (talk) 17:09, 7 December 2015 (EST)

²I think that a person should be allowed to hold 2 positions. On an unrelated note, holding GA meetings with most people present would be a good idea in that the resolutions can be directly discussed, modified, and passed at the same time instead of having to go through notes and re-modify/pass resolutions. Camelfantasy (Meh) 11:00, 9 December 2015 (EST)

³I think that if someone is going for a position an already have another, they need to get more than 75% of the cast votes to et the position. If they do not meet this target but get a majority, the people who voted for them must vote again.

Outcome

The new policy will be in effect starting second terms of all officers (March).

Resolution 7  Passed 

This resolution is to prevent single players from excersizing more power over the organization than others. The provisions of the resolution are as follows:

• A town mayor may only be represented by one vote (or one half-vote for observer cities) in any resolution.
• Players with multiple cities must organize them as follows, either:
  • All cities are included in one inter-city organization that is represented in the League of Cities, or:
  • Only the flagship city is represented in the League of Cities, and other cities are considered territories of the flagship city

Example A: KittyCat11231 owns Nippia, Kitania, Zaquar, and Zicronia. None of them are direct members of the League of Cities, however, they are all provinces of the City-State of Kitania, which is a member of the League of Cities. Therefore, KittyCat11231 only gets one vote in the League of Cities, under the City-State of Kitania.

Example B: Camelfantasy owns Formosa and Fort Yaxier. Formosa is a prominent member of the League of Cities, but Fort Yaxier is not, as it is treated as a territory of Formosa and therefore shares Formosa's membership in the League of Cities. Therefore, camelfantasy only gets one vote in the League of Cities, under Formosa.

This resolution is designed to ensure that all members of the League of Cities have equal power and to prevent players with multiple cities from excersizing more power over the organization.

This rule will not apply to shared municipalities. Different cities within an SMP can choose to be represented separately.

Vote	# of votes
In Favor	23
Against

City	Representative	Vote
Formosa	camelfantasy	In Favor
Brunswick	_hnt
Arctic Plains SMP	sesese9	In Favor
Lacledic Republic	jphgolf4321	In Favor
Beaufort	frankbros429
Birchwood Lake City	PresidentQwerty
Armada	Ardyan	In Favor
Kenthurst	AlikSong	In Favour
Whiteley	AP_Red	In Favor
City-State of Kitania	KittyCat11231	In Favor
Sealane	RLcrafters	In Favor
Accerton	CaptainChimpy	In Favor
Mallison	jamess2912	In Favor
Elecna Bay	mine_man_	In Favor1
Whitechapel	_frozen
Seaview	_Redneck_Jesus_
Saint Roux	Just_robinho
Wythern	Baseball02	In Favor
Siletz	MeetMeInSpace	In Favor
Mason City	kiwirainbow
Grayzen (O)	cardinalland
Royal Ferry	MIKE24DUDE	In Favor
Janghwa City	HanSangYoon	In Favor
Astoria	TonyTajiri	In Favor
Snowtopic	Duechayapol	In Favor
Xilia (O)	Yellowitcher
Ellesume	allifarki	Against
Utopia	Narnia17	In Favor
New Phoenix	_MajorMagpie_
Storalisburg	Vulpicula
Ezzo City	ezzocraft
Espil	_InDev_	In Favour
Vermilion	chiefbozx
Woodsdale	Hightech_TR
Spruce Plains	shadowboarder
Waterville	PtldKnight
Liten	Gopher	In Favor
City of Evella	LDShadowLord	In Favor
Konawa	Soleurs
Loudoun	DullesTdt	In Favor
Royal Plaza	KevinTheLlama
Newton-le-Willows	Patrick44_LFC
Airchester	CortesiRaccoon
Mecklenburg	tarheelscouse
Kelvinside	Martii_Scots01	In Favor
Haibian	cookiesareedible
Pearl Coast	knowmads7
Amestris	MRTKeikoku
Segville	godzilltrain
Spring Valley (O)	Architect_21
Helix Bay	TrainPro
Radiance Square	MindBender15
42	Leo_2807
Numark	bryce_am
New Covina	_Kastle
Scoton	MrDynamo_
Kolpino City	MishkaMan
Iconia	EchoRyuko
Avalon	Member_Me
Wolf Peak	bnsjninja
Wellington	JohnNotTech
Spruce Neck	Derpy_Melon
AEville	AEhub
Rochshire	MC_Protocol

¹In the case of a member part of a shared city, which is not an smp, then they have a second individual city, that member should have the vote of their own city as well as a joint vote with the members he shares a city with

Outcome

This new policy is now in effect effective immediately.

Resolution 8  Passed 

This resolution seeks to change how the Deputy Secretariat is appointed. Essentially, upon the reelections of all League of Cities positions, instead of a separate election to appoint the Deputy Secretariat, each nominee for Secretariat would have to appoint a running mate, who would be Deputy Secretariat if the nominee won.

Vote	# of votes
In Favor	21.5
Against	1

City	Representative	Vote
Formosa	camelfantasy	In Favor
Brunswick	_hnt
Arctic Plains SMP	sesese9	In Favor
Lacledic Republic	jphgolf4321	In Favor
Beaufort	frankbros429
Birchwood Lake City	PresidentQwerty
Armada	Ardyan	In Favor
Kenthurst	AlikSong	In Favor
Whiteley	AP_Red
City-State of Kitania	KittyCat11231	In Favor
Sealane	RLcrafters	In Favor1
Accerton	CaptainChimpy	In Favor
Mallison	jamess2912	In Favor
Elecna Bay	mine_man_
Whitechapel	_frozen
Seaview	_Redneck_Jesus_
Saint Roux	Just_robinho
Wythern	Baseball02	In Favor
Siletz	MeetMeInSpace	In Favor
Mason City	kiwirainbow	In Favor
Grayzen (O)	cardinalland
Royal Ferry	MIKE24DUDE	In Favor
Janghwa City	HanSangYoon	In Favor
Astoria	TonyTajiri	In Favor
Snowtopic	Duechayapol
Xilia (O)	Yellowitcher	In Favor
Ellesume	allifarki
Utopia	Narnia17	In Favor1
New Phoenix	_MajorMagpie_
Storalisburg	Vulpicula	In Favor
Ezzo City	ezzocraft
Espil	_InDev_	In Favor
Vermilion	chiefbozx
Woodsdale	Hightech_TR
Spruce Plains	shadowboarder	Against
Waterville	PtldKnight
Liten	Gopher
City of Evella	LDShadowLord	In Favor
Konawa	Soleurs
Loudoun	DullesTdt	In Favor
Royal Plaza	KevinTheLlama
Newton-le-Willows	Patrick44_LFC
Airchester	CortesiRaccoon
Mecklenburg	tarheelscouse
Kelvinside	Martii_Scots01	In Favor
Haibian	cookiesareedible
Pearl Coast	knowmads7
Amestris	MRTKeikoku
Segville	godzilltrain
Spring Valley (O)	Architect_21
Helix Bay	TrainPro
Radiance Square	MindBender15
42	Leo_2807
Numark	bryce_am
New Covina	_Kastle
Scoton	MrDynamo_
Kolpino City	MishkaMan
Iconia	EchoRyuko
Avalon	Member_Me
Wolf Peak	bnsjninja
Wellington	JohnNotTech
Spruce Neck	Derpy_Melon
AEville	AEhub
Rochshire	MC_Protocol

• 1: On condition that the deputy to the secretariat agrees beforehand that they want the position.

Outcome

Resolution passed, secretariat chooses deputy upon election.

Resolution 9  Finished 

This resolution is to find members' preferences for a color scheme of LoC department offices in Armada. Colors include all 16 clay colors plus hardened and regular clay, for a total of 18 choices.

Clay Type	# of votes
Clay
White
Orange	2
Magenta
Light Blue	4
Yellow
Lime
Pink
Gray
Light Gray
Cyan
Purple
Blue	0.5
Brown
Green
Red
Black
Hardened
Abstain	4

City	Representative	Vote
Formosa	camelfantasy
Brunswick	_hnt
Arctic Plains SMP	sesese9
Lacledic Republic	jphgolf4321	Light Blue
Beaufort	frankbros429	Abstain
Birchwood Lake City	PresidentQwerty
Armada	Ardyan
Kenthurst	AlikSong	Light Blue
Whiteley	AP_Red
City-State of Kitania	KittyCat11231
Sealane	RLcrafters	Abstain
Accerton	CaptainChimpy
Mallison	jamess2912
Elecna Bay	mine_man_
Whitechapel	_frozen
Seaview	_Redneck_Jesus_
Saint Roux	Just_robinho
Wythern	Baseball02
Siletz	MeetMeInSpace	Light Blue
Mason City	kiwirainbow
Grayzen (O)	cardinalland
Royal Ferry	MIKE24DUDE
Janghwa City	HanSangYoon
Astoria	TonyTajiri
Snowtopic	Duechayapol
Xilia (O)	Yellowitcher
Ellesume	allifarki
Utopia	Narnia17	Light Blue
New Phoenix	_MajorMagpie_
Storalisburg	Vulpicula
Ezzo City	ezzocraft	Abstain
Espil	_InDev_	Orange
Vermilion	chiefbozx
Woodsdale	Hightech_TR
Spruce Plains	shadowboarder
Waterville	PtldKnight
Liten	Gopher
City of Evella	LDShadowLord
Konawa	Soleurs
Loudoun	DullesTdt
Royal Plaza	KevinTheLlama
Newton-le-Willows	Patrick44_LFC
Airchester	CortesiRaccoon
Dandenong (former)	MC_Dunc	Orange
Mecklenburg	tarheelscouse
Kelvinside	Martii_Scots01	Abstain
Haibian	cookiesareedible
Pearl Coast	knowmads7
Amestris	MRTKeikoku
Segville	godzilltrain
Spring Valley (O)	Architect_21	Blue
Helix Bay	TrainPro
Radiance Square	MindBender15
42	Leo_2807
Numark	bryce_am
New Covina	_Kastle
Scoton	MrDynamo_
Kolpino City	MishkaMan
Iconia	EchoRyuko
Avalon	Member_Me
Wolf Peak	bnsjninja
Wellington	JohnNotTech
Spruce Neck	Derpy_Melon
AEville	AEhub
Rochshire	MC_Protocol

Resolution 10  Passed 

This resolution is designed to prevent stupid and pointless resolutions from wasting the LoC's time, while maintaining the democratic nature of the resolution process.

If passed, the following procedures will be implemented:

• Any LoC member can formally propose a resolution to the leaders, however, it will not immediately be put up to voting.

• After a resolution is proposed, the leaders will have 48 hours to review the resolution. Four out of the five leaders must reject the resolution within that time frame to not continue the resolution to general voting.

• If 4/5 of the leaders vote against a general vote on the resolution within 48 hours, it will not be put up for general voting.

• If less than 4/5 leaders vote against a general vote on the resolution within 48 hours, it will be put up for voting for all League of Cities members.

• Leaders who reject a resolution must include a valid written reason. Leaders are not allowed to reject a resolution for voting because of their ideological opinions and are only allowed to reject resolutions for general voting because they are either of non-importance or a waste of time. Any leader who violates this rule will have their vote not count, for both initial review and general voting, and will receive an infraction, two of which will expel them from their position. This prevents leaders from blocking the democratic process of the LoC.

• If a resolution is rejected by the leaders, a notice will be added to the wiki on this page noting the written reasons given by each leader who voted against opening the resolution to general voting.

Vote	# of votes
In Favor	16.5
Against

City	Representative	Vote
Formosa	camelfantasy	In Favor
Brunswick	_hnt
Arctic Plains SMP	sesese9
Lacledic Republic	jphgolf4321	In Favor
Beaufort	frankbros429	In Favor
Birchwood Lake City	PresidentQwerty
Armada	Ardyan	In Favor¹
Kenthurst	AlikSong	In Favour
Whiteley	AP_Red	In Favour
City-State of Kitania	KittyCat11231	In Favor
Sealane	RLcrafters	In Favor
Accerton	CaptainChimpy
Mallison	jamess2912
Elecna Bay	mine_man_	In Favor
Whitechapel	_frozen
Seaview	_Redneck_Jesus_
Saint Roux	Just_robinho
Wythern	Baseball02	In Favor
Siletz	MeetMeInSpace	In Favor
Mason City	kiwirainbow
Grayzen (O)	cardinalland
Royal Ferry	MIKE24DUDE
Janghwa City	HanSangYoon
Astoria	TonyTajiri
Snowtopic	Duechayapol
Xilia (O)	Yellowitcher
Ellesume	allifarki
Utopia	Narnia17	In Favor
New Phoenix	_MajorMagpie_
Storalisburg	Vulpicula
Ezzo City	ezzocraft
Espil	_InDev_	In Favour
Vermilion	chiefbozx	In Favor
Woodsdale	Hightech_TR
Spruce Plains	shadowboarder
Waterville	PtldKnight
Liten	Gopher
City of Evella	LDShadowLord
Konawa	Soleurs
Loudoun	DullesTdt
Royal Plaza	KevinTheLlama
Newton-le-Willows	Patrick44_LFC
Airchester	CortesiRaccoon
Dandenong (former)	MC_Dunc	In Favor
Mecklenburg	tarheelscouse
Kelvinside	Martii_Scots01	In Favour
Haibian	cookiesareedible
Pearl Coast	knowmads7
Amestris	MRTKeikoku
Segville	godzilltrain
Spring Valley (O)	Architect_21	In Favor
Helix Bay	TrainPro
Radiance Square	MindBender15
42	Leo_2807
Numark	bryce_am
New Covina	_Kastle
Scoton	MrDynamo_
Kolpino City	MishkaMan
Iconia	EchoRyuko
Avalon	Member_Me
Wolf Peak	bnsjninja
Wellington	JohnNotTech
Spruce Neck	Derpy_Melon
AEville	AEhub
Rochshire	MC_Protocol

Notes

1: by the way, could we have a LoC-endorsed straw poll page to ask stupid and pointless questions there? -ardy

That's exactly what we're planning ardy. Camelfantasy (Meh) 09:20, 14 January 2016 (EST)

Outcome

All future resolutions will follow the process above.

Resolution 11  Passed 

This resolution will outline the procedure for the League of Cities judicial system.

The judicial system will be centered around the International Court of Justice. The head of this court is the LoC Chief Justice, who is regularly elected with the rest of the leadership positions. The Chief Justice is responsible for making decisions in cases brought before the court.

Any player who is accused of violating League of Cities policies will be brought before the International Court of Justice. The accused player is entitled to an attorney of their choosing, or to defend themself. The player has a right to plead guilty or innocent. A guilty plea will lead to immediate punishment. An innocent plea will lead to a fair trial.

Any leader of the League of Cities may act as the prosecutor in a case unless they are the player standing trial. If the Chief Justice is on trial, the secretariat will act as justice for the trial.

Players may sue other players for violations of policy as well. The lawsuit must be rejected by 4/5 leaders to not immediately go to trial, unless any leader or the League of Cities itself is being sued.

Leaders of the League of Cities, as well as the organization itself, are NOT exempt from legal action in the International Court of Justice.

If a player is found guily after a trial, or pleads guilty without trial, the Chief Justice will decide the punishment for the player. This punishment 'cannot include any confiscation of property, including money, and cannot go beyond the reaches of the power of the League of Cities.

All trials will be public.

Vote	# of votes
In Favor	9
Against	2.5

City	Representative	Vote
Formosa	camelfantasy
Brunswick	_hnt
Arctic Plains SMP	sesese9
Lacledic Republic	jphgolf4321	In Favor
Beaufort	frankbros429
Birchwood Lake City	PresidentQwerty
Armada	Ardyan	In Favor
Kenthurst	AlikSong	In Favour
Whiteley	AP_Red	In Favor
City-State of Kitania	KittyCat11231	In Favor
Sealane	RLcrafters
Accerton	CaptainChimpy
Mallison	jamess2912
Elecna Bay	mine_man_	In Favor
Whitechapel	_frozen	Against1
Seaview	_Redneck_Jesus_
Saint Roux	Just_robinho
Wythern	Baseball02	In Favor
Siletz	MeetMeInSpace	In Favor
Mason City	kiwirainbow
Grayzen (O)	cardinalland
Royal Ferry	MIKE24DUDE	In Favor
Janghwa City	HanSangYoon
Astoria	TonyTajiri
Snowtopic	Duechayapol
Xilia (O)	Yellowitcher	Against
Ellesume	allifarki
Utopia	Narnia17
New Phoenix	_MajorMagpie_
Storalisburg	Vulpicula
Ezzo City	ezzocraft
Espil	_InDev_
Vermilion	chiefbozx
Woodsdale	Hightech_TR
Spruce Plains	shadowboarder
Waterville	PtldKnight
Liten	Gopher
City of Evella	LDShadowLord	In Favor
Konawa	Soleurs
Loudoun	DullesTdt
Royal Plaza	KevinTheLlama
Newton-le-Willows	Patrick44_LFC
Airchester	CortesiRaccoon
Mecklenburg	tarheelscouse
Kelvinside	Martii_Scots01
Haibian	cookiesareedible
Pearl Coast	knowmads7
Amestris	MRTKeikoku
Segville	godzilltrain	Against
Spring Valley (O)	Architect_21
Helix Bay	TrainPro
Radiance Square	MindBender15
42	Leo_2807
Numark	bryce_am
New Covina	_Kastle
Scoton	MrDynamo_
Kolpino City	MishkaMan
Iconia	EchoRyuko
Avalon	Member_Me
Wolf Peak	bnsjninja
Wellington	JohnNotTech
Spruce Neck	Derpy_Melon
AEville	AEhub
Rochshire	MC_Protocol

Notes

1: Even though OPEC supports the formation of a proper judicial system (and is one of its 5 goals), OPEC feels that there is no purpose of a judicial system if there is no standard, peer-based law of the land to use and make legal decisions on. We should focus on that first before considering the establishment of a judicial system. By setting up a ICOJ with no law gives the Chief Justice way too much power, and decisions will vary from every elected judge to the next, causing major disagreements.

The law you refer to is the LoC Policies page. In addition, we may have a jury of several randomly selected people for the peer-based part. We will discuss this at the Feb meeting, and feel free to suggest improvements/ideas. - Camelfantasy

So what happens if a court case goes beyond the justice with no existing policies in place? Theres NOTHING to cover that right now. Frozen (talk) 18:44, 1 February 2016 (EST)

In that case we would take it to either a jury or the GA to decide on as a whole. Also, as said before, feel free to make suggestions. - Camelfantasy

Outcome

This procedure for the Intercity Court of Justice will take effect immediately.

Resolution 12  Did Not Pass 

AKA: Anti-Corruption Resolution

This resolution amends League of Cities Policy 1051.

The goal of this resolution is to prevent special interests from affecting the elections process of the League of Cities. The resolution proposes the following:

• Candidates may not accept monetary donations of higher than $20 from any player or organization, including their own political party.
• Any candidate who violates this will be expelled from the election and receive disciplinary action.
• The League of Cities will create a new Election Commission, to be led by the Deputy Secretariat, to enforce these rules.

Vote	# of votes
In Favor	9
Against	10

City	Representative	Vote
Formosa	camelfantasy	Against
Brunswick	_hnt
Arctic Plains SMP	sesese9
Lacledic Republic	jphgolf4321
Beaufort	frankbros429
Birchwood Lake City	PresidentQwerty
Armada	Ardyan	In Favour
Kenthurst	AlikSong	In Favour
Whiteley	AP_Red	In Favor
City-State of Kitania	KittyCat11231	Against
Sealane	RLcrafters
Accerton	CaptainChimpy
Mallison	jamess2912
Elecna Bay	mine_man_	In Favor
Whitechapel	_frozen	Against**
Seaview	_Redneck_Jesus_
Saint Roux	Just_robinho
Wythern	Baseball02	Against
Siletz	MeetMeInSpace	Against
Mason City	kiwirainbow	In Favour
Grayzen (O)	cardinalland
Royal Ferry	MIKE24DUDE	In Favor
Janghwa City	HanSangYoon
Astoria	TonyTajiri
Snowtopic	Duechayapol
Xilia (O)	Yellowitcher	Against*
Ellesume	allifarki
Utopia	Narnia17	In Favour
New Phoenix	_MajorMagpie_
Storalisburg	Vulpicula	In Favor
Ezzo City	ezzocraft
Espil	_InDev_
Vermilion	chiefbozx
Woodsdale	Hightech_TR
Spruce Plains	shadowboarder
Waterville	PtldKnight
Liten	Gopher
City of Evella	LDShadowLord	Against**
Konawa	Soleurs
Loudoun	DullesTdt
Royal Plaza	KevinTheLlama
Newton-le-Willows	Patrick44_LFC
Airchester	CortesiRaccoon
Mecklenburg	tarheelscouse
Kelvinside	Martii_Scots01
Haibian	cookiesareedible
Pearl Coast	knowmads7
Amestris	MRTKeikoku
Segville	godzilltrain	Against
Spring Valley (O)	Architect_21
Helix Bay	TrainPro
Radiance Square	MindBender15
42	Leo_2807	In Favor
Numark	bryce_am	Against
New Covina	_Kastle
Scoton	MrDynamo_
Kolpino City	MishkaMan
Iconia	EchoRyuko
Avalon	Member_Me
Wolf Peak	bnsjninja
Wellington	JohnNotTech
Spruce Neck	Derpy_Melon
AEville	AEhub
Rochshire	MC_Protocol

• The Election Commission should have its own leader - Yellow
  • Needs revision. Salaries are now not possible. - LDS (Evella)
    • Agreed with LD-- the way its written is too broad and can cause confusion. Frozen (talk) 22:14, 20 February 2016 (EST)
      • @LDS ditto. - HSY

Please elaborate on what you mean by salaries. - Camelfantasy

Just as he stated, parties aren't able to pay sufficient salaries to its staffs if this resolution was to be passed. This rule means that anyone paying over $20 to anyone among political parties are immediately condemned as corrupt, in which would sometimes be inaccurate. Unless if the party was communism, salaries and money exchanging would be very important among all parties. -HSY

Just a note, I'm not expecting there to be actual salaries/payment among political parties. At any rate, my vote has been changed. - Camelfantasy

Outcome

This resolution will not take effect.

Resolution 13  Passed 

This resolution amends League of Cities policy 1053.

This resolution acts as a check on the power of the leaders, and is a follow up to Resolution 10. If this resolution passes, the following policy will immediately take effect:

• If a resolution is rejected by 4/5 leaders within 48 hours of proposal and does not go to general voting, the player who proposed it can get the signatures of 10 other League of Cities members (not including observers) to immediately put the resolution up for general voting.

Vote	# of votes
In Favor	19
Against	2

City	Representative	Vote
Formosa	camelfantasy	In Favor
Brunswick	_hnt
Arctic Plains SMP	sesese9
Lacledic Republic	jphgolf4321	In Favor
Beaufort	frankbros429
Birchwood Lake City	PresidentQwerty
Armada	Ardyan	In Favor
Kenthurst	AlikSong	In Favour
Whiteley	AP_Red	In Favour
City-State of Kitania	KittyCat11231	In Favor
Sealane	RLcrafters
Accerton	CaptainChimpy	In Favour
Mallison	jamess2912
Elecna Bay	mine_man_	Against
Whitechapel	_frozen	In Favor
Seaview	_Redneck_Jesus_
Saint Roux	Just_robinho
Wythern	Baseball02	In Favor
Siletz	MeetMeInSpace	In Favor
Mason City	kiwirainbow	In Favour
Grayzen (O)	cardinalland	In Favor
Royal Ferry	MIKE24DUDE	In Favor
Janghwa City	HanSangYoon
Astoria	TonyTajiri
Snowtopic	Duechayapol
Xilia (O)	Yellowitcher
Ellesume	allifarki
Utopia	Narnia17	In Favour
New Phoenix	_MajorMagpie_
Storalisburg	Vulpicula	In Favour
Ezzo City	ezzocraft
Espil	_InDev_	In Favour
Vermilion	chiefbozx
Woodsdale	Hightech_TR
Spruce Plains	shadowboarder
Waterville	PtldKnight	In Favour
Liten	Gopher
City of Evella	LDShadowLord
Konawa	Soleurs
Loudoun	DullesTdt	In Favor
Royal Plaza	KevinTheLlama
Newton-le-Willows	Patrick44_LFC
Airchester	CortesiRaccoon
Mecklenburg	tarheelscouse
Kelvinside	Martii_Scots01
Haibian	cookiesareedible
Pearl Coast	knowmads7
Amestris	MRTKeikoku
Segville	godzilltrain	Against
Spring Valley (O)	Architect_21
Helix Bay	TrainPro
Radiance Square	MindBender15
42	Leo_2807
Numark	bryce_am	In Favor
New Covina	_Kastle
Scoton	MrDynamo_
Kolpino City	MishkaMan
Iconia	EchoRyuko
Avalon	Member_Me
Wolf Peak	bnsjninja
Wellington	JohnNotTech
Spruce Neck	Derpy_Melon	In Favor
AEville	AEhub
Rochshire	MC_Protocol

Outcome

This policy will take effect immediately.

Resolution 14  Passed 

This resolution seeks to enforce spending rules for the League of Cities to prevent large purchases from being made without the consent of League of Cities members.

If this resolution passes, the following policies will take effect:

• All major spending conducted and sanctioned by the League of Cities as a whole must be approved by resolution or by General Assembly meeting.
• No League of Cities member can be required to contribute any money to any purchase, or be threatened with punishment if they don't do so.

Vote	# of votes
In Favor	13.5
Against	9

City	Representative	Vote
Formosa	camelfantasy	Against
Brunswick	_hnt
Arctic Plains SMP	sesese9
Lacledic Republic	jphgolf4321	In Favor
Beaufort	frankbros429
Birchwood Lake City	PresidentQwerty
Armada	Ardyan	In Favor
Kenthurst	AlikSong	Against
Whiteley	AP_Red	In Favor
City-State of Kitania	KittyCat11231	In Favor
Sealane	RLcrafters
Accerton	CaptainChimpy	Against
Mallison	jamess2912
Elecna Bay	mine_man_	Against
Whitechapel	_frozen	Against
Seaview	_Redneck_Jesus_
Saint Roux	Just_robinho
Wythern	Baseball02	In Favor
Siletz	MeetMeInSpace	In Favor
Mason City	kiwirainbow	In Favour
Grayzen (O)	cardinalland	In Favor
Royal Ferry	MIKE24DUDE	In Favor
Janghwa City	HanSangYoon	In Favor (under Juhwa)
Astoria	TonyTajiri
Snowtopic	Duechayapol
Xilia (O)	Yellowitcher	In Favor
Ellesume	allifarki
Utopia	Narnia17	In Favor
New Phoenix	_MajorMagpie_
Storalisburg	Vulpicula	Against
Ezzo City	ezzocraft
Espil	_InDev_	Against
Vermilion	chiefbozx
Woodsdale	Hightech_TR
Spruce Plains	shadowboarder
Waterville	PtldKnight	In Favour
Liten	Gopher
City of Evella	LDShadowLord	In Favor
Konawa	Soleurs
Loudoun	DullesTdt	Against
Royal Plaza	KevinTheLlama
Newton-le-Willows	Patrick44_LFC
Airchester	CortesiRaccoon
Mecklenburg	tarheelscouse
Kelvinside	Martii_Scots01
Haibian	cookiesareedible
Pearl Coast	knowmads7
Amestris	MRTKeikoku
Segville	godzilltrain	In Favor
Spring Valley (O)	Architect_21
Helix Bay	TrainPro
Radiance Square	MindBender15
42	Leo_2807
Numark	bryce_am	Against
New Covina	_Kastle
Scoton	MrDynamo_
Kolpino City	MishkaMan
Iconia	EchoRyuko
Avalon	Member_Me
Wolf Peak	bnsjninja
Wellington	JohnNotTech
Spruce Neck	Derpy_Melon
AEville	AEhub
Rochshire	MC_Protocol

• Who in-game keeps control of money? Do you realize by the way this is written, that person CANNOT spend one cent whatsoever on his/her own personal income because we will not be able to determine who spent what. - _frozen

_hnt is currently the treasurer and holds all assets. Also, by spending, it means major spending as in hiring a builder for LoC facilities. - Camelfantasy

Outcome

This policy will take effect immediately.

Resolution 15  Partially Passed 

15.1) Officer candidates must have some sort of campaign to run.

15.2) Subordinate officers under an LoC official will be appointed by that officer.

15.3) Matters deemed too trivial to go through the entire resolutions process will instead be voted on by the leaders, with a simple majority (3) required for passage/rejection.

15.1		15.2		15.3
In Favor	Against	In Favor	Against	In Favor	Against
151	1	15	1	4	12

City	Representative	Vote
Formosa	camelfantasy	In Favor for all
Brunswick	_hnt
Arctic Plains SMP	sesese9
Lacledic Republic	jphgolf4321	15.1) In Favor1 15.2) In Favor 15.3) Against
Beaufort	frankbros429
Birchwood Lake City	PresidentQwerty
Armada	Ardyan	15.1) In Favor 15.2) In Favor 15.3) Against
Kenthurst	AlikSong	15.1) In Favour 15.2) In Favour 15.3) Against
Whiteley	AP_Red
City-State of Kitania	KittyCat11231	15.1) In Favor 15.2) In Favor 15.3) Against
Sealane	RLcrafters
Accerton	CaptainChimpy	15.1) In Favor 15.2) In Favor 15.3) Against
Mallison	jamess2912
Elecna Bay	mine_man_
Whitechapel	_frozen
Seaview	_Redneck_Jesus_
Saint Roux	Just_robinho
Wythern	Baseball02	15.1) In Favor 15.2) In Favor 15.3) Against
Siletz	MeetMeInSpace	14.1) In Favor 15.2) In Favor 15.3) Against
Mason City	kiwirainbow
Grayzen (O)	cardinalland
Royal Ferry	MIKE24DUDE	15.1) Against 15.2) In Favor 15.3) Against
Janghwa City	HanSangYoon	15.1) In Favor 15.2) In Favor 15.3) Against (under Juhwa)
Astoria	TonyTajiri
Snowtopic	Duechayapol
Xilia (O)	Yellowitcher
Ellesume	allifarki
Utopia	Narnia17	In Favour for all
New Phoenix	_MajorMagpie_
Storalisburg	Vulpicula
Ezzo City	ezzocraft	15.1) and 15.3) = In Favour / 15.2 = Against
Espil	_InDev_	In Favour for all
Vermilion	chiefbozx
Woodsdale	Hightech_TR
Spruce Plains	shadowboarder
Waterville	PtldKnight	In Favour for all
Liten	Gopher
City of Evella	LDShadowLord	15.1 In Favor1 15.2) In Favor 15.3) Against
Konawa	Soleurs
Loudoun	DullesTdt	15.1) In Favor 15.2) In Favor 15.3) Against
Royal Plaza	KevinTheLlama
Newton-le-Willows	Patrick44_LFC
Airchester	CortesiRaccoon
Mecklenburg	tarheelscouse
Kelvinside	Martii_Scots01
Haibian	cookiesareedible
Pearl Coast	knowmads7
Amestris	MRTKeikoku
Segville	godzilltrain	15.1) In Favor 15.2) In Favor 15.3) Against
Spring Valley (O)	Architect_21
Helix Bay	TrainPro
Radiance Square	MindBender15
42	Leo_2807
Numark	bryce_am
New Covina	_Kastle
Scoton	MrDynamo_
Kolpino City	MishkaMan
Iconia	EchoRyuko
Avalon	Member_Me
Wolf Peak	bnsjninja
Wellington	JohnNotTech
Spruce Neck	Derpy_Melon
AEville	AEhub
Rochshire	MC_Protocol

¹What do you mean by "campaign?" If by that you mean a roleplay twitter account, a slogan, a logo, an official hashtag, and extensive campaign writing (etc.) then count me as against. On the other hand, if you mean just the campaigning as it exists now then I'm wholeheartedly in favor. jphgolf4321 (talk) 18:14, 22 February 2016 (EST)

By campaign I mean what is happening now, as in writing a paragraph or so about what you have done and what you wish to do. - Camelfantasy

Outcome

15.1 and 15.2 will go into effect immediately. 15.3 will not pass.

Resolution 16  Passed 

This resolution is in order to prevent inactive officers from taking up space in the League of Cities.

The following policies will come into effect regarding officers:

• If an elected officer of the League of Cities is inactive for a period of 30 days, the Secretariat will appoint a temporary replacement officer to fill their seat, who must be confirmed by a majority of the leaders.
• After a temporary replacement officer is appointed, if the elected officer returns within another 30 days, the replacement officer must step down and return their position to the elected officer.
• If an elected officer of the League of Cities is inactive for a period of 60 days, a special election will be held to appoint a new officer for that position, which will be held by resolution, unless it is within 14 days of a General Election.

The following policies will come into effect regarding leaders:

• If an elected leader of the League of Cities is inactive for a period of 30 days, the Secretariat will fill the leader's position, or appoint the Deputy Secretariat to fill the leader's position, unless it is the Secretariat who is inactive, in which case the Deputy Secretariat will fill their position.
• If an elected leader of the League of Cities who is not the Secretariat is inactive for a period of 60 days, a special election will be held to appoint a new leader for that position, which will be held by resolution, unless it is within 14 days of a General Election.
• If the Secretariat of the League of Cities is inactive for a period of 60 days, the Deputy Secretariat will inherit their position and appoint a new Deputy Secretariat.

Vote	# of votes
In Favor	17
Against

City	Representative	Vote
Formosa	camelfantasy	In Favor
Brunswick	_hnt
Arctic Plains SMP	sesese9
Lacledic Republic	jphgolf4321	In Favor
Beaufort	frankbros429
Birchwood Lake City	PresidentQwerty
Armada	Ardyan	In Favor
Kenthurst	AlikSong	In Favour
Whiteley	AP_Red	In Favor
City-State of Kitania	KittyCat11231	In Favor
Sealane	RLcrafters
Accerton	CaptainChimpy	In Favor
Mallison	jamess2912
Elecna Bay	mine_man_
Whitechapel	_frozen
Seaview	_Redneck_Jesus_
Saint Roux	Just_robinho
Wythern	Baseball02	In Favor
Siletz	MeetMeInSpace	In Favor
Mason City	kiwirainbow
Grayzen (O)	cardinalland
Royal Ferry	MIKE24DUDE	In Favor
Janghwa City	HanSangYoon
Astoria	TonyTajiri
Snowtopic	Duechayapol
Xilia (O)	Yellowitcher
Ellesume	allifarki
Utopia	Narnia17	In Favor
New Phoenix	_MajorMagpie_
Storalisburg	Vulpicula	In Favor
Ezzo City	ezzocraft	In Favour (with a modification1
Espil	_InDev_
Vermilion	chiefbozx
Woodsdale	Hightech_TR
Spruce Plains	shadowboarder
Waterville	PtldKnight	In Favor
Liten	Gopher
City of Evella	LDShadowLord
Konawa	Soleurs
Loudoun	DullesTdt	In Favor
Royal Plaza	KevinTheLlama
Newton-le-Willows	Patrick44_LFC
Airchester	CortesiRaccoon
Mecklenburg	tarheelscouse
Kelvinside	Martii_Scots01
Haibian	cookiesareedible
Pearl Coast	knowmads7
Amestris	MRTKeikoku
Segville	godzilltrain	In Favor
Spring Valley (O)	Architect_21
Helix Bay	TrainPro
Radiance Square	MindBender15
42	Leo_2807
Numark	bryce_am
New Covina	_Kastle
Scoton	MrDynamo_
Kolpino City	MishkaMan
Iconia	EchoRyuko
Avalon	Member_Me
Wolf Peak	bnsjninja
Wellington	JohnNotTech
Spruce Neck	Derpy_Melon
AEville	AEhub
Rochshire	MC_Protocol

¹If a LoC leader had to leave for 60-90 days due to an emergency, the secretariat will fill will in temporarily ONLY.

Outcome

This policy will take effect immediately.

Resolution 17  Did Not Pass 

This resolution proposes a road system to be used by all LoC members (Cities who do not have roads are exempt from this resolution), making transport by road easier for LoC Members, officers, and non-LoC users (except if the road is locked away from non-LoC users). Each city will have its main road/intercity road(s) (depending on rank). Roads that connect between LoC offices/GA(s) must be recognized due to the sheer need by the LoC users. This proposed road system can be for Member cities - Premier cities, but intercity roads are still locked to Councillor and up (MRT rules).

Vote	# of votes
In Favor	1
Against	16

City	Representative	Vote
Formosa	camelfantasy
Brunswick	_hnt	Against
Arctic Plains SMP	sesese9
Lacledic Republic	jphgolf4321	Against
Beaufort	frankbros429
Birchwood Lake City	PresidentQwerty
Armada	Ardyan	Against¹
Kenthurst	AlikSong	Against
Whiteley	AP_Red	Against
City-State of Kitania	KittyCat11231	Against
Sealane	RLcrafters
Accerton	CaptainChimpy	Against2
Mallison	jamess2912
Elecna Bay	mine_man_
Whitechapel	_frozen
Seaview	_Redneck_Jesus_
Saint Roux	Just_robinho
Wythern	Baseball02	Against
Siletz	MeetMeInSpace	Against
Mason City	kiwirainbow
Grayzen (O)	cardinalland	Against
Royal Ferry	MIKE24DUDE	Against
Janghwa City	HanSangYoon
Astoria	TonyTajiri
Snowtopic	Duechayapol
Xilia (O)	Yellowitcher
Ellesume	allifarki
Utopia	Narnia17	Against
New Phoenix	_MajorMagpie_
Storalisburg	Vulpicula
Ezzo City	ezzocraft
Espil	_InDev_
Vermilion	chiefbozx	Against
Woodsdale	Hightech_TR
Spruce Plains	shadowboarder
Waterville	PtldKnight	Against
Liten	Gopher
City of Evella	LDShadowLord
Konawa	Soleurs
Loudoun	DullesTdt	Against
Royal Plaza	KevinTheLlama
Newton-le-Willows	Patrick44_LFC
Airchester	CortesiRaccoon
Mecklenburg	tarheelscouse
Kelvinside	Martii_Scots01
Haibian	cookiesareedible
Pearl Coast	knowmads7
Amestris	MRTKeikoku
Segville	godzilltrain	Against
Spring Valley (O)	Architect_21
Helix Bay	TrainPro
Radiance Square	MindBender15
42	Leo_2807
Numark	bryce_am
New Covina	_Kastle
Scoton	MrDynamo_
Kolpino City	MishkaMan
Iconia	EchoRyuko
Avalon	Member_Me
Wolf Peak	bnsjninja
Wellington	JohnNotTech
Spruce Neck	Derpy_Melon	In Favor
AEville	AEhub
Rochshire	MC_Protocol

1: I don't see any valid reasons why LOC-Exclusive roads will be officially approved in GSMs, because the chances are there is already a road connecting the town to the other, and a new road will be a waste of land. (Contributing to what just happened before the gamma in the old world)Ardyan - director of stupid and pointless since 2016 (talk) 16:01, 26 February 2016 (EST)

I think that if we don't approve of this we can instead create road designations for LoC use, that would give the TC something to do. Also we could possibly create a LoC-exclusive transit system instead, i.e. using an intercity bus system exclusive to LoC cities only. - Camelfantasy

I would be in favor of having the TC and SaROC collaborate to sign pre-existing roads as Official LoC Routes and Official LoC Evacuation Routes jphgolf4321 (talk) 18:36, 26 February 2016 (EST)

TBH Camel and JPH's feedback is what I meant. Ezzo (talk) 04:28, 27 February 2016 (EST)

Well, still not gonna work as a designation system, I have my signage that is deemed very unrealistic by others, and I don't plan to change. Pretty sure the others are also going to think like that. And ezzo, please make sure you're wording your proposals correctly in the future. Ardyan - director of stupid and pointless since 2016 (talk) 05:38, 27 February 2016 (EST)

Agreed Ardy - All big roads have to get approval before they can be built - unauthorized big roads that cross the map are subject to removal by staff, unless the rules changed. So I don't see exactly what this is supposed to be achieving. chiefbozx • talk • contribs 23:51, 26 February 2016 (EST)

I am not against a road designation system but this resolution is far from a working plan. I suggest discussion at the next meeting. I'm not KittyCat11231's evil twin! (talk) 08:56, 27 February 2016 (EST)

The wording is a bit confusing to me...Cardinalland (talk) 09:41, 27 February 2016 (EST)

2: SaROC evacuation routes and aid channels do not require the need for LoC-exclusive roads. Therefore this resolution is pretty much useless. Chimpeh - Gimmeh da bananas now! :D (talk) 10:16, 28 February 2016 (EST)

Outcome

This resolution will not take effect.

Resolution 18  Passed 

This resolution amends LoC policy 1050.

If this resolution passes, the following policies will be implemented:

• The voting period for a resolution will be shortened to one week.
• Any issues decided at a General Assembly Meeting carry the same weight as a Resolution.
• A roll call will be conducted at the beginning of any General Assembly Meeting to record the usernames of the players present. The names will be recorded by the General Assembly Chief or an appointee.
• Votes conducted at a General Assembly Meeting will be done through a basic tally (ie: Strawpoll). The votes will be recorded by the General Assembly Chief or an appointee.
• Players unable to attend a meeting are given 24 hours following the meeting to approve or reject decisions made at the meeting. The vote tallies for those 24 hours must be added to the vote count from the meeting, which is to be recorded at the meeting either by the General Assembly Chief or an appointee.

Vote	# of votes
In Favor	12
Against	0.5

City	Representative	Vote
Formosa	camelfantasy	In Favor
Brunswick	_hnt	In Favor
Arctic Plains SMP	sesese9	In Favor
Lacledic Republic	jphgolf4321	In Favor
Beaufort	frankbros429
Birchwood Lake City	PresidentQwerty
Armada	Ardyan	In Favor
Kenthurst	AlikSong	In Favour
Whiteley	AP_Red
City-State of Kitania	KittyCat11231	In Favor
Sealane	RLcrafters
Accerton	CaptainChimpy
Mallison	jamess2912
Elecna Bay	mine_man_
Whitechapel	_frozen
Seaview	_Redneck_Jesus_
Saint Roux	Just_robinho
Wythern	Baseball02	In Favor
Siletz	MeetMeInSpace	In Favor
Mason City	kiwirainbow
Grayzen (O)	cardinalland
Royal Ferry	MIKE24DUDE	In Favor
Janghwa City	HanSangYoon
Astoria	TonyTajiri
Snowtopic	Duechayapol
Xilia (O)	Yellowitcher	Against
Ellesume	allifarki
Utopia	Narnia17	In Favor
New Phoenix	_MajorMagpie_
Storalisburg	Vulpicula
Ezzo City	ezzocraft
Espil	_InDev_
Vermilion	chiefbozx
Woodsdale	Hightech_TR
Spruce Plains	shadowboarder
Waterville	PtldKnight	In Favor
Liten	Gopher
City of Evella	LDShadowLord
Konawa	Soleurs
Loudoun	DullesTdt
Royal Plaza	KevinTheLlama
Newton-le-Willows	Patrick44_LFC
Airchester	CortesiRaccoon
Mecklenburg	tarheelscouse
Kelvinside	Martii_Scots01
Haibian	cookiesareedible
Pearl Coast	knowmads7
Amestris	MRTKeikoku
Segville	godzilltrain
Spring Valley (O)	Architect_21
Helix Bay	TrainPro
Radiance Square	MindBender15
42	Leo_2807
Numark	bryce_am
New Covina	_Kastle
Scoton	MrDynamo_
Kolpino City	MishkaMan
Iconia	EchoRyuko
Avalon	Member_Me
Wolf Peak	bnsjninja
Wellington	JohnNotTech
Spruce Neck	Derpy_Melon	In Favor
AEville	AEhub
Rochshire	MC_Protocol

So who's going to put this in the policies? jphgolf4321 (talk) 12:21, 16 March 2016 (EDT)

Based on trends, either Kitty or I will when we have time. Camelfantasy (M e h) 14:08, 16 March 2016 (EDT)

Outcome

This Resolution passes as proposed.

Resolution 19  Did Not Pass 

This resolution will create rules for elections, specifically ballot counting, effective as of the September 2016 election. The main purpose of this resolution is to preserve anonymity in the voting process by preventing leaders and other players from knowing the specific votes of other players.

The following policies are proposed:

• The members of the League of Cities will elect a ballot counter, to be considered an officer of the League of Cities. The purpose of the ballot counter is to preserve anonymity in the voting process, by preventing leaders from viewing player's votes.
• The ballot counter is the only player who may view any player's specific votes. If the ballot counter shares details of specific players' votes, he/she will be expelled from their position.
• The ballot counter may not publicly endorse any candidate in a general election.
• The ballot counter may not run for another position at the election after they are elected.
• The ballot counter's job is to count the number of votes for each candidate in a general election. They must count and then recount at least twice.
• Ballot counters may only have one term in office. After a ballot counter is elected at a General Election, he/she will be responsible for counting the ballots at the next General Election.
• The first ballot counter will be elected by resolution, which will immediately go to voting following the passage of the resolution.
• If a ballot counter is offline for 7 days following the closing of polls in a General Election, an emergency replacement ballot counter will be elected by resolution.
• Following an election, the incumbent ballot counter may be paid for their services (this part will be discussed at the next GA Meeting).
• Unlike other official positions, the ballot counter does not necessarily need to be a member of the League of Cities.

Vote	# of votes
In Favor	4
Against	9

City	Representative	Vote
Formosa	camelfantasy	Against1
Brunswick	_hnt	Against
Arctic Plains SMP	sesese9	Against
Lacledic Republic	jphgolf4321	Against2
Beaufort	frankbros429
Birchwood Lake City	PresidentQwerty
Armada	Ardyan	Against3
Kenthurst	AlikSong	Against3
Whiteley	AP_Red
City-State of Kitania	KittyCat11231	In Favor
Sealane	RLcrafters
Accerton	CaptainChimpy
Mallison	jamess2912
Elecna Bay	mine_man_
Whitechapel	_frozen
Seaview	_Redneck_Jesus_
Saint Roux	Just_robinho
Wythern	Baseball02	Against
Siletz	MeetMeInSpace	In Favor
Mason City	kiwirainbow
Grayzen (O)	cardinalland
Royal Ferry	MIKE24DUDE	In Favor
Janghwa City	HanSangYoon	Against4
Astoria	TonyTajiri
Snowtopic	Duechayapol
Xilia (O)	Yellowitcher
Ellesume	allifarki
Utopia	Narnia17	In Favor
New Phoenix	_MajorMagpie_
Storalisburg	Vulpicula
Ezzo City	ezzocraft
Espil	_InDev_
Vermilion	chiefbozx
Woodsdale	Hightech_TR
Spruce Plains	shadowboarder
Waterville	PtldKnight
Liten	Gopher
City of Evella	LDShadowLord
Konawa	Soleurs
Loudoun	DullesTdt
Royal Plaza	KevinTheLlama
Newton-le-Willows	Patrick44_LFC
Airchester	CortesiRaccoon
Mecklenburg	tarheelscouse
Kelvinside	Martii_Scots01
Haibian	cookiesareedible
Pearl Coast	knowmads7
Amestris	MRTKeikoku
Segville	godzilltrain
Spring Valley (O)	Architect_21	Against
Helix Bay	TrainPro
Radiance Square	MindBender15
42	Leo_2807
Numark	bryce_am
New Covina	_Kastle
Scoton	MrDynamo_
Kolpino City	MishkaMan
Iconia	EchoRyuko
Avalon	Member_Me
Wolf Peak	bnsjninja
Wellington	JohnNotTech
Spruce Neck	Derpy_Melon	Against
AEville	AEhub
Rochshire	MC_Protocol

¹I'm only in favor of this if instead of electing a vote counter six months ahead of time to basically do nothing until election time we elect the vote counter about two weeks ahead of the election. It would be pointless to do it much sooner than that. jphgolf4321 (talk) 21:20, 2 March 2016 (EST)

Edit: after reading Alik's point below I've changed my vote. jphgolf4321 (talk) 15:20, 9 March 2016 (EST)

It honestly does not matter when the ballot counter is elected. Doing it in the prior General Election streamlines the process by preventing time from being wasted by extra elections we don't need. I'm not KittyCat11231's evil twin! (talk) 21:34, 2 March 2016 (EST)

I propose that this not be marked as a position of the same ranking as the officers and leaders, instead as a Support Officer or something like that to distinguish its lesser importance during terms. Camelfantasy (M e h) 21:37, 2 March 2016 (EST)

³I'm against this because it's yet another change which clogs up the ease of operation of the LoC. Just let camel do it, since he can't get elected/won't go for election.--Aliksong (talk) 17:39, 9 March 2016 (EST)
⁴It's plain simple on the reasons of why this would be a bad idea. Anonymous voting lets corrupted data be far easier to manipulate of, and also, we don't have an issue with voting right now, depite no anonymity. It would just be a degradation and annoyance for us voters if this was to be passed. -HSY

Outcome

These policies will not take effect.

Resolution 20  Did Not Pass 

This resolution amends Policies 1053, and also proposes 1054. It would be considered as a follow-up to Resolution 10.

1053

Proposal to Resolution Process

Any League of Cities member can formally propose a Resolution or a Poll to the leaders. However, it will not be immediately put up for voting. After a proposal is made, the leaders will have 48 hours to review the resolution. Four out of the five leaders must reject the resolution within that time frame to not continue the resolution to general voting. If 4/5 of the leaders vote against a general vote on the resolution within 48 hours, it will not be put up for general voting. Instead, it will be put up as a poll. If less than 4/5 leaders vote against a general vote on the resolution within 48 hours, it will be put up for voting for all League of Cities members as a Resolution. If the proposal is made as a Poll, It will require all leaders to reject the Poll in order to prevent it from being put for general voting. After a proposal is rejected, the proposer may collect signatures of 10 members to directly put it for voting.

1054

Differences between a Poll and a Resolution

A Resolution is a formal proposal, affecting a vast amount of members and cities. A Resolution might be used to change a lot of things, ranging from replacing officers to create new rules and offices. A Poll is also a completely formal way of proposing changes, though, the changes would be much smaller compared to what a Resolution does. A Poll would be used to ask about general opinions of members about certain things, make minor changes to the policies, and anything that wouldn't have large effects compared to the effects of a Resolution.

1054.1

How a Poll is proposed

A poll is proposed in the same way as a Resolution is proposed, by either specifying that the proposal is a Poll, or that a Resolution proposal gets rejected by 4/5 of the leaders. If that happens. The propsal will not be rejected, but will be accepted as a Poll. A new wikipage will be created for the Polls. The Polls will use the chart used in Resolution 1.

Vote	# of votes
In Favor	1
Against	8

City	Representative	Vote
Formosa	camelfantasy
Brunswick	_hnt	Against
Arctic Plains SMP	sesese9	Against
Lacledic Republic	jphgolf4321	Against1
Beaufort	frankbros429
Birchwood Lake City	PresidentQwerty
Armada	Ardyan
Kenthurst	AlikSong
Whiteley	AP_Red
City-State of Kitania	KittyCat11231	Against
Sealane	RLcrafters
Accerton	CaptainChimpy
Mallison	jamess2912
Elecna Bay	mine_man_
Whitechapel	_frozen
Seaview	_Redneck_Jesus_
Saint Roux	Just_robinho
Wythern	Baseball02	Against
Siletz	MeetMeInSpace	Against
Mason City	kiwirainbow
Grayzen (O)	cardinalland
Royal Ferry	MIKE24DUDE	In Favor
Janghwa City	HanSangYoon
Astoria	TonyTajiri
Snowtopic	Duechayapol
Xilia (O)	Yellowitcher
Ellesume	allifarki
Utopia	Narnia17	Against2
New Phoenix	_MajorMagpie_
Storalisburg	Vulpicula
Ezzo City	ezzocraft
Espil	_InDev_
Vermilion	chiefbozx
Woodsdale	Hightech_TR
Spruce Plains	shadowboarder
Waterville	PtldKnight	Against
Liten	Gopher
City of Evella	LDShadowLord
Konawa	Soleurs
Loudoun	DullesTdt
Royal Plaza	KevinTheLlama
Newton-le-Willows	Patrick44_LFC
Airchester	CortesiRaccoon
Mecklenburg	tarheelscouse
Kelvinside	Martii_Scots01
Haibian	cookiesareedible
Pearl Coast	knowmads7
Amestris	MRTKeikoku
Segville	godzilltrain
Spring Valley (O)	Architect_21
Helix Bay	TrainPro
Radiance Square	MindBender15
42	Leo_2807
Numark	bryce_am
New Covina	_Kastle
Scoton	MrDynamo_
Kolpino City	MishkaMan
Iconia	EchoRyuko
Avalon	Member_Me
Wolf Peak	bnsjninja
Wellington	JohnNotTech
Spruce Neck	Derpy_Melon
AEville	AEhub
Rochshire	MC_Protocol

Don't we already do this by ourselves via Strawpoll? And Also how did this not get vetoed, seems pretty pointless to me. -Ptld
Yes, we can, though it would cause concerns of authenticity among members. A plan was expressed by Camel about adding an poll system, and it was indeed added (Archiving resolutions), though it appears more like a one-off poll and not something for public use. The plan is to make polls under the LoC umbrella available for all players to discuss stuff that's still important but not too important to make it a full-fledged resolution. It's also a possible backdoor to the legislation system in case the vetoing system gets corrupted (Doubt this will happen though) --Ardyan - director of stupid and pointless since 2016 (talk) 09:24, 9 March 2016 (EST)

¹I'd support this if the polls are conducted via Strawpoll, Surveymonkey, or Google Forms. jphgolf4321 (talk) 18:01, 8 March 2016 (EST)

The reason why I didn't want to use strawpolls is that it could be spammed and the lack of transparency. Google Forms would be a good idea though, if we required everyone to put in their names. I will discuss with camel about how I can make a change on that.--Ardyan - director of stupid and pointless since 2016 (talk) 09:14, 9 March 2016 (EST)

One problem with this is that it is still very easy to impersonate someone else, and to spam it, as seen with past Forms where there have been quite a number of trolls, despite promised severe punishments. For the first part, we could simply generate voting codes for each member that would be known only to them and anyone counting the votes. The second part could be solved by requiring email sign-in, as that will severely lower the prospects of spamming. Camelfantasy (M e h) 11:54, 9 March 2016 (EST)

Makes sense, though one of my goals with polling is also that it won't require much maintenance from leaders. If we tried to give out codes for polls then creating and maintaining polls would be way harder than our current system with resolutions. It's also worth noting that polls are meant to be used for small disputes and stuff, and I believe it would be pointless to try to give codes for something like that. I will once again recommend Resolution 1 chart, it's very suitable for my needs from a poll, and lists only cities that explicitly agree or disagree with the poll. (Saving uninterested cities from voting "Abstain")--Ardyan - director of stupid and pointless since 2016 (talk) 14:59, 9 March 2016 (EST)

Resolution 22  Passed 

This resolution amends League of Cities policy 2030. If this resolution passes, the Founder will become a position that can be removed by a 2/3 vote by all League of Cities members in the same process as the removal of any other leader. Additionally, the Founder, beginning at the September election, must be confirmed by a majority vote at every League of Cities General Election.

Vote	# of votes
In Favor	10
Against	3.5

City	Representative	Vote
Formosa	camelfantasy	Against
Brunswick	_hnt
Arctic Plains SMP	sesese9
Lacledic Republic	jphgolf4321	In Favor
Beaufort	frankbros429
Birchwood Lake City	PresidentQwerty
Armada	Ardyan
Kenthurst	AlikSong	Against
Whiteley	AP_Red
City-State of Kitania	KittyCat11231	In Favor
Sealane	RLcrafters
Accerton	CaptainChimpy
Mallison	jamess2912
Elecna Bay	mine_man_	In Favor
Whitechapel	_frozen
Seaview	_Redneck_Jesus_
Saint Roux	Just_robinho
Wythern	Baseball02	Against
Siletz	MeetMeInSpace	In Favor
Mason City	kiwirainbow
Grayzen (O)	cardinalland	Against2
Royal Ferry	MIKE24DUDE	In Favor
Janghwa City	HanSangYoon
Astoria	TonyTajiri
Snowtopic	Duechayapol
Xilia (O)	Yellowitcher
Ellesume	allifarki
Utopia	Narnia17	In Favor
New Phoenix	_MajorMagpie_
Storalisburg	Vulpicula
Ezzo City	ezzocraft
Espil	_InDev_
Vermilion	chiefbozx
Woodsdale	Hightech_TR
Spruce Plains	shadowboarder
Waterville	PtldKnight
Liten	Gopher
City of Evella	LDShadowLord
Konawa	Soleurs
Loudoun	DullesTdt
Royal Plaza	KevinTheLlama
Newton-le-Willows	Patrick44_LFC
Airchester	CortesiRaccoon
Mecklenburg	tarheelscouse	In Favor
Kelvinside	Martii_Scots01
Haibian	cookiesareedible
Pearl Coast	knowmads7
Amestris	MRTKeikoku
Segville	godzilltrain	In Favor
Spring Valley (O)	Architect_21
Helix Bay	TrainPro
Radiance Square	MindBender15
42	Leo_2807
Numark	bryce_am
New Covina	_Kastle	In Favor
Scoton	MrDynamo_
Kolpino City	MishkaMan
Iconia	EchoRyuko
Avalon	Member_Me
Wolf Peak	bnsjninja
Wellington	JohnNotTech
Spruce Neck	Derpy_Melon	In Favor
AEville	AEhub
Rochshire	MC_Protocol

¹: I am against this because the founder founded the League of Cities, and it doesn't make sense to me that that can change. Cardinalland (talk) 13:12, 15 March 2016 (EDT) ² ^ Cardinal. Also, for the Founder to be able to be removed and replaced, that would require a rewriting of its role as the purpose of a permanent Founder would be different from an elected replacement. Therefore I will vote against this unless there is such plan to do what I have mentioned. Camelfantasy (M e h) 14:22, 15 March 2016 (EDT)

Outcome

Since Passed, this Resolution will make Founder an Removable Position like all other Officer Positions.

Resolution 23  Passed 

This is a follow-up to the amendment of Policy 2030. Provided the motion passes, it would create the new Policies 2030.1 and 2030.2, which would read as follows:

2030.1

Upon removal of the Founder, he will keep his title but his powers will be transferred to a replacement elected by Resolution to be known as the Consul.

2030.2

The Consul is to be elected from the pool of leaders of current non-observer members of the League of Cities. There will be no campaigning, as every non-observer city's leader will be a candidate for the position. If the elected Consul declines his appointment, subsequent ballots will be cast until a winner who wants the position can be determined.

Vote	# of votes
In Favor	11
Against	2

City	Representative	Vote
Formosa	camelfantasy	Against 1
Brunswick	_hnt
Arctic Plains SMP	sesese9	In Favor
Lacledic Republic	jphgolf4321	In Favor2
Beaufort	frankbros429
Birchwood Lake City	PresidentQwerty
Armada	Ardyan
Kenthurst	AlikSong	In Favor
Whiteley	AP_Red
City-State of Kitania	KittyCat11231	In Favor
Sealane	RLcrafters
Accerton	CaptainChimpy	Against 2
Mallison	jamess2912
Elecna Bay	mine_man_
Whitechapel	_frozen
Seaview	_Redneck_Jesus_
Saint Roux	Just_robinho
Wythern	Baseball02	In Favor
Siletz	MeetMeInSpace	In Favor
Mason City	kiwirainbow
Grayzen (O)	cardinalland
Royal Ferry	MIKE24DUDE	In Favor
Janghwa City	HanSangYoon
Astoria	TonyTajiri
Snowtopic	Duechayapol
Xilia (O)	Yellowitcher	In Favor
Ellesume	allifarki
Utopia	Narnia17	In Favor
New Phoenix	_MajorMagpie_
Storalisburg	Vulpicula
Ezzo City	ezzocraft
Espil	_InDev_
Vermilion	chiefbozx
Woodsdale	Hightech_TR
Spruce Plains	shadowboarder
Waterville	PtldKnight
Liten	Gopher
City of Evella	LDShadowLord
Konawa	Soleurs
Loudoun	DullesTdt
Royal Plaza	KevinTheLlama
Newton-le-Willows	Patrick44_LFC
Airchester	CortesiRaccoon
Mecklenburg	tarheelscouse
Kelvinside	Martii_Scots01
Haibian	cookiesareedible
Pearl Coast	knowmads7
Amestris	MRTKeikoku
Segville	godzilltrain
Spring Valley (O)	Architect_21
Helix Bay	TrainPro
Radiance Square	MindBender15
42	Leo_2807
Numark	bryce_am
New Covina	_Kastle	In Favor
Scoton	MrDynamo_
Kolpino City	MishkaMan
Iconia	EchoRyuko
Avalon	Member_Me
Wolf Peak	bnsjninja
Wellington	JohnNotTech
Spruce Neck	Derpy_Melon	In Favor
AEville	AEhub
Rochshire	MC_Protocol

¹ Policy 255 says the Founder would nominate a successor should he leave office, which will then be confirmed by 80% of voting cities. Camelfantasy (M e h) 22:19, 12 March 2016 (EST)

² As I said on the proposal page, 2030.1 and 2030.2 would take effect only if the Founder were removed by vote of the General Assembly. If the Founder were to retire on his own, then he would be allowed to name his successor.

Also, camel, you added that policy without it ever being approved by resolution, which questions its validity. I'm not KittyCat11231's evil twin! (talk) 12:07, 13 March 2016 (EDT)

The idea was already there from several months ago, though why it wasn't on the Policies page I have no idea. Camelfantasy (M e h) 10:53, 15 March 2016 (EDT)

² We already have the Secretariat, why make another position that is virtually the same as the Founder? There should be no elected position. I'd say that all the Founder is allowed to do is maintain the buildings. Chimpeh - Gimmeh da bananas now! :D (talk) 17:22, 25 March 2016 (EDT)

Resolution 24  Did Not Pass 

If this resolution passes, the voting period for a resolution will be shortened for three days after a General Assembly Meeting.

Vote	# of votes
In Favor	0
Against	10

City	Representative	Vote
Formosa	camelfantasy	Against 1
Brunswick	_hnt
Arctic Plains SMP	sesese9
Lacledic Republic	jphgolf4321	Against
Beaufort	frankbros429
Birchwood Lake City	PresidentQwerty
Armada	Ardyan
Kenthurst	AlikSong	Against
Whiteley	AP_Red
City-State of Kitania	KittyCat11231	Against
Sealane	RLcrafters
Accerton	CaptainChimpy	Against
Mallison	jamess2912
Elecna Bay	mine_man_
Whitechapel	_frozen
Seaview	_Redneck_Jesus_
Saint Roux	Just_robinho
Wythern	Baseball02	Against
Siletz	MeetMeInSpace	Against
Mason City	kiwirainbow
Grayzen (O)	cardinalland
Royal Ferry	MIKE24DUDE	Against
Janghwa City	HanSangYoon	Against
Astoria	TonyTajiri
Snowtopic	Duechayapol
Xilia (O)	Yellowitcher
Ellesume	allifarki
Utopia	Narnia17	Against
New Phoenix	_MajorMagpie_
Storalisburg	Vulpicula
Ezzo City	ezzocraft
Espil	_InDev_
Vermilion	chiefbozx
Woodsdale	Hightech_TR
Spruce Plains	shadowboarder
Waterville	PtldKnight
Liten	Gopher
City of Evella	LDShadowLord
Konawa	Soleurs
Loudoun	DullesTdt
Royal Plaza	KevinTheLlama
Newton-le-Willows	Patrick44_LFC
Airchester	CortesiRaccoon
Mecklenburg	tarheelscouse
Kelvinside	Martii_Scots01
Haibian	cookiesareedible
Pearl Coast	knowmads7
Amestris	MRTKeikoku
Segville	godzilltrain
Spring Valley (O)	Architect_21
Helix Bay	TrainPro
Radiance Square	MindBender15
42	Leo_2807
Numark	bryce_am
New Covina	_Kastle
Scoton	MrDynamo_
Kolpino City	MishkaMan
Iconia	EchoRyuko
Avalon	Member_Me
Wolf Peak	bnsjninja
Wellington	JohnNotTech
Spruce Neck	Derpy_Melon	Against
AEville	AEhub
Rochshire	MC_Protocol

¹The wording of this is just downright confusing and ambiguous. Resolutions voting will be shortened to 3 days following the next GA meeting? Camelfantasy (M e h) 22:19, 12 March 2016 (EST)

Not only that, but by what it says by itself it's very unneccesary. -HSY

Resolution 25  Did Not Pass 

This resolution establishes a proportional voting system for all elections where there are more than two candidates running. This also applies in resolutions with more than two options.

• Voters will be asked to rank candidates in order of preference. They do not need to rank all candidates.
• The first place votes will be tallied first. Then, the last place candidate will be eliminated, and the voters for the last place candidate will have their second choice vote added to their second choice candidate.
• Then, the candidate who becomes last place will have their voters' next choice vote moved to their next preference.
• This process will continue until only two candidates will remain, one of which will remain based on first, second, third, etc place votes.
• Explanation on the proposed voting system

Vote	# of votes
In Favor	5.5
Against	6

City	Representative	Vote
Formosa	camelfantasy	Against
Brunswick	_hnt
Arctic Plains SMP	sesese9
Lacledic Republic	jphgolf4321	Against
Beaufort	frankbros429
Birchwood Lake City	PresidentQwerty
Armada	Ardyan
Kenthurst	AlikSong	Against
Whiteley	AP_Red	In Favor
City-State of Kitania	KittyCat11231	In Favor
Sealane	RLcrafters
Accerton	CaptainChimpy	Against
Mallison	jamess2912
Elecna Bay	mine_man_
Whitechapel	_frozen
Seaview	_Redneck_Jesus_
Saint Roux	Just_robinho
Wythern	Baseball02
Siletz	MeetMeInSpace	In Favor
Mason City	kiwirainbow
Grayzen (O)	cardinalland
Royal Ferry	MIKE24DUDE	Against
Janghwa City	HanSangYoon	Against1
Astoria	TonyTajiri
Snowtopic	Duechayapol
Xilia (O)	Yellowitcher	In Favor
Ellesume	allifarki
Utopia	Narnia17	In Favor
New Phoenix	_MajorMagpie_
Storalisburg	Vulpicula
Ezzo City	ezzocraft
Espil	_InDev_
Vermilion	chiefbozx
Woodsdale	Hightech_TR
Spruce Plains	shadowboarder
Waterville	PtldKnight	Against
Liten	Gopher
City of Evella	LDShadowLord
Konawa	Soleurs
Loudoun	DullesTdt
Royal Plaza	KevinTheLlama
Newton-le-Willows	Patrick44_LFC
Airchester	CortesiRaccoon
Mecklenburg	tarheelscouse
Kelvinside	Martii_Scots01
Haibian	cookiesareedible
Pearl Coast	knowmads7
Amestris	MRTKeikoku
Segville	godzilltrain
Spring Valley (O)	Architect_21
Helix Bay	TrainPro
Radiance Square	MindBender15
42	Leo_2807
Numark	bryce_am
New Covina	_Kastle
Scoton	MrDynamo_
Kolpino City	MishkaMan
Iconia	EchoRyuko
Avalon	Member_Me
Wolf Peak	bnsjninja
Wellington	JohnNotTech
Spruce Neck	Derpy_Melon	In Favor
AEville	AEhub
Rochshire	MC_Protocol

¹ Despite my liking of this concept, I find this hard to grasp when the time and the amount of value the LoC Voting gets to us are limited. In this case we must vote numerous times to complete one resolution or poll, and that would not only waste our time, but also take away our remaining concern for the LoC. I believe this resolution is smart and ideal IF the LoC were to hold far more value (like New Zealand flag change or Olympics/World Cup bid process), yet then again, lacks the concept of balanced time management and effort. -HSY

It's just too overcomplicated for my liking. Also, Han, it would just be for elections, not resolutions as well. jphgolf4321 (talk) 16:17, 13 March 2016 (EDT)

Except in such cases where the election of an official via Resolution is necessary, like when an officer goes inactive and a replacement will be elected by Resolution. Camelfantasy (M e h) 10:56, 15 March 2016 (EDT)

Resolution 26  Partially Passed 

26.1):

== 1030.1 ==

With 4/5 Leader approval, the League of Cities may demote member states to observer status as it sees fit. Demotions would last in increments of one month and may be extended or cut short at the discretion of the Founder, Secretariat, or Deputy Secretariat. In order to veto a demotion to observer, a simple majority of the General Assembly must vote in favor.

== 1030.2 ==

If demotion to observer status is extended past the point at which it adds up to more than three months, the state will be removed from the League of Cities until that time expires (unless vetoed by the General Assembly), at which point it may rejoin as an observer for a month. If at the end of the month the Leaders see fit, the state may be promoted to full membership.

26.2) If passed, there will be different ranks in the LoC. The ranks will work like the MRT rank system. there can be different permissions for different ranks.

26.3) This resolution, if passed, changes the inauguration timing after elections to make them make more sense. The new policy would read as follows and take effect immediately:

After an election, the new leaders and officers will officially be appointed to the position by the Founder during the first weekend after the elections.

Note: if passed, inauguration of officers elected in this March's elections would be the first weekend after the resolution passes.

26.4) Since the whole seconding resolution proposals thing that's been in effect since October is only being enforced now (and this is the first I've heard of it), I think the matter should be put up for voting by the General Assembly. If the motion passes, it will create a new Policy (to be numbered later) making the rule official. If it fails, seconding resolution proposals will not be a thing, and no new policy will be written.

Resolution	Vote	# of votes
26.1	In Favor	3
	Against	9
26.2	In Favor
	Against	11
26.3	In Favor	10
	Against	1
26.4	In Favor	8
	Against	3

Vote like this: 26.1) In Favour/Against 26.2) In Favour/Against 26.3) In Favour/Against 26.4) In Favour/Against

City	Representative	Vote
Formosa	camelfantasy	26.1) In Favor 26.2) Against 26.3) In Favor 26.4) In Favor
Brunswick	_hnt
Arctic Plains SMP	sesese9	26.1) Against 26.2) Against 26.3) In Favor 26.4) In Favor
Lacledic Republic	jphgolf4321	26.1) In Favor 26.2) Against 26.3) In Favor 26.4) Against
Beaufort	frankbros429
Birchwood Lake City	PresidentQwerty
Armada	Ardyan
Kenthurst	AlikSong	26.1) Against 26.2) Against 26.3) In Favor 26.4) Against
Whiteley	AP_Red
City-State of Kitania	KittyCat11231	26.1) Against 26.2) Against 26.3) In Favor 26.4) In Favor
Sealane	RLcrafters
Accerton	CaptainChimpy	26.1) Against 26.2) Against 26.3) In Favor 26.4) In Favor
Mallison	jamess2912
Elecna Bay	mine_man_
Whitechapel	_frozen
Seaview	_Redneck_Jesus_
Saint Roux	Just_robinho
Wythern	Baseball02	26.1) In Favor 26.2) Against 26.3) In Favor 26.4) In Favor
Siletz	MeetMeInSpace	26.1) Against 26.2) Against 26.3) In Favor 26.4) In Favor
Mason City	kiwirainbow
Grayzen (O)	cardinalland
Royal Ferry	MIKE24DUDE	Against
Janghwa City	HanSangYoon
Astoria	TonyTajiri
Snowtopic	Duechayapol
Xilia (O)	Yellowitcher
Ellesume	allifarki
Utopia	Narnia17	Against 26.2) Against 26.3) In Favor 26.4) In Favor
New Phoenix	_MajorMagpie_
Storalisburg	Vulpicula
Ezzo City	ezzocraft
Espil	_InDev_
Vermilion	chiefbozx
Woodsdale	Hightech_TR
Spruce Plains	shadowboarder
Waterville	PtldKnight	Against 26.2) Against 26.3) In Favor 26.4) In Favor
Liten	Gopher
City of Evella	LDShadowLord
Konawa	Soleurs
Loudoun	DullesTdt
Royal Plaza	KevinTheLlama
Newton-le-Willows	Patrick44_LFC
Airchester	CortesiRaccoon
Mecklenburg	tarheelscouse
Kelvinside	Martii_Scots01
Haibian	cookiesareedible
Pearl Coast	knowmads7
Amestris	MRTKeikoku
Segville	godzilltrain
Spring Valley (O)	Architect_21
Helix Bay	TrainPro
Radiance Square	MindBender15
42	Leo_2807
Numark	bryce_am
New Covina	_Kastle	Against 26.2) Against 26.3) Against 26.4) Against
Scoton	MrDynamo_
Kolpino City	MishkaMan
Iconia	EchoRyuko
Avalon	Member_Me
Wolf Peak	bnsjninja
Wellington	JohnNotTech
Spruce Neck	Derpy_Melon
AEville	AEhub
Rochshire	MC_Protocol

Resolution 27  Nominations Finished 

This resolution seeks to elect a new General Assembly Chief following the resignation of mine_man_, the GAC-elect.

Nominations must either be seconded by another player or endorsed by a political party. In accordance with LoC policy, no player may hold more than one position in the League of Cities.

Nominees:

• jphgolf4321 (he will resign from SAC) - Nominated by camelfantasy, seconded by _hnt

Outcome

jphgolf4321 is the New GAC

Resolution 28  Did Not Pass 

Amendment to Policy 1020

This amendment seeks to rewrite policy 1020 so that, in order for a player to be demoted to observer or be removed the proposal must go through the same proposal process as a resolution. If the proposal is passed by the leaders with a 4/5 majority it will then be voted on by the general members. If the proposal passes by 3/4 in favor or more the Member will be demoted to observer a reasonable amount of time(No more than a 45 days). If the goal is to remove the member a court case must be held to the public to provide evidence for the demotion as well as determine whether or not the member will be demoted.Should the judge give the go ahead to remove the member the action will take place accordingly. If the judge decides against the removal the member will be left at observer for a 1 to 3 month period of time. After this time the member will be instated unless evidence is given to keep the state at observer for a longer period of time or remove the state based on evidence and a court case. Should the member be left in the LoC as an observer again they will have a 2-4 month period as observer where after they will be instated unless there are anymore objections in which case the member will be excluded from the LoC for up to 6 months after that can apply to be reinstated as an observer until the following GAC meeting where a vote of all the attendees as well as people that vote within the next 3 days can decide whether the member can stay or be excluded from the LoC permanently. The removed member can appeal the decision 6 months after their removal in which case an 85% majority of all members of the LoC must vote in favor to reinstate the member as observer permanently.

Vote	# of votes
In Favor	2
Against	3

City	Representative	Vote
Formosa	camelfantasy	Against
Brunswick	_hnt
Arctic Plains SMP	sesese9
Lacledic Republic	jphgolf4321	Against
Beaufort	frankbros429
Birchwood Lake City	PresidentQwerty
Armada	Ardyan
Kenthurst	AlikSong	Against
Whiteley	AP_Red
City-State of Kitania	KittyCat11231
Sealane	RLcrafters
Accerton	CaptainChimpy
Mallison	jamess2912
Elecna Bay	mine_man_
Whitechapel	_frozen
Seaview	_Redneck_Jesus_
Saint Roux	Just_robinho
Wythern	Baseball02
Siletz	MeetMeInSpace
Mason City	kiwirainbow
Grayzen (O)	cardinalland
Royal Ferry	MIKE24DUDE	In Favor
Janghwa City	HanSangYoon
Astoria	TonyTajiri
Snowtopic	Duechayapol
Xilia (O)	Yellowitcher
Ellesume	allifarki
Utopia	Narnia17
New Phoenix	_MajorMagpie_
Storalisburg	Vulpicula
Ezzo City	ezzocraft
Espil	_InDev_
Vermilion	chiefbozx
Woodsdale	Hightech_TR
Spruce Plains	shadowboarder
Waterville	PtldKnight	In Favor
Liten	Gopher
City of Evella	LDShadowLord
Konawa	Soleurs
Loudoun	DullesTdt
Royal Plaza	KevinTheLlama
Newton-le-Willows	Patrick44_LFC
Airchester	CortesiRaccoon
Mecklenburg	tarheelscouse
Kelvinside	Martii_Scots01
Haibian	cookiesareedible
Pearl Coast	knowmads7
Amestris	MRTKeikoku
Segville	godzilltrain
Spring Valley (O)	Architect_21
Helix Bay	TrainPro
Radiance Square	MindBender15
42	Leo_2807
Numark	bryce_am
New Covina	_Kastle
Scoton	MrDynamo_
Kolpino City	MishkaMan
Iconia	EchoRyuko
Avalon	Member_Me
Wolf Peak	bnsjninja
Wellington	JohnNotTech
Spruce Neck	Derpy_Melon
AEville	AEhub
Rochshire	MC_Protocol

I personally think, if observer demotions go through the same process as a resolution, then it should be exactly the same process as a Resolution. That would mean anyone could propose a demotion with a seconder, it would take a 4/5 veto to prevent it from going to the GA, and a simple majority would be enough to enact the demotion. The time periods and court cases I have no problem with, but I do think the permanent observer reinstatement thing should also be the exact same process as a Resolution (proposal with seconder, 4/5 to veto, GA majority). jphgolf4321 (talk) 18:49, 28 March 2016 (EDT)

I feel that we should atleast have the rule of All Removals have to go to Court. If this doesn't pass I will bring that rule to the table. --Ptld | "That is our Comment, We welcome Yours." ~Fred Nutter (talk) 15:49, 29 March 2016 (EDT)

Resolution 29  Nominations Finished 

This resolution seeks to elect a new Supreame Allied Commander following the resignation of jphgolf4321, after he was elected to be the GAC after mine_man_ resignation.

Nominations must either be seconded by another player or endorsed by a political party. In accordance with LoC policy, no player may hold more than one position in the League of Cities.

Nominees:

• PtldKnight | Nominated by MIKE24DUDE, seconded by _hnt
• _Kastle | Nominated by KittyCat11231, seconded by jphgolf4321

Resolution 30  Finished 

Emergency election of a new SAC following the resignation of jphgolf4321 after his emergency election to GAC.

Nominee	Votes
PtldKnight
_Kastle	5

City	Representative	Vote
Formosa	camelfantasy
Brunswick	_hnt
Arctic Plains SMP	sesese9
Lacledic Republic	jphgolf4321	_Kastle
Beaufort	frankbros429
Birchwood Lake City	PresidentQwerty
Armada	Ardyan
Kenthurst	AlikSong
Whiteley	AP_Red
City-State of Kitania	KittyCat11231	_Kastle
Sealane	RLcrafters
Accerton	CaptainChimpy
Mallison	jamess2912
Elecna Bay	mine_man_
Whitechapel	_frozen
Seaview	_Redneck_Jesus_
Saint Roux	Just_robinho
Wythern	Baseball02	_Kastle
Siletz	MeetMeInSpace	_Kastle
Mason City	kiwirainbow
Grayzen (O)	cardinalland
Royal Ferry	MIKE24DUDE
Janghwa City	HanSangYoon
Astoria	TonyTajiri
Snowtopic	Duechayapol
Xilia (O)	Yellowitcher
Ellesume	allifarki
Utopia	Narnia17
New Phoenix	_MajorMagpie_
Storalisburg	Vulpicula
Ezzo City	ezzocraft
Espil	_InDev_
Vermilion	chiefbozx
Woodsdale	Hightech_TR
Spruce Plains	shadowboarder
Waterville	PtldKnight
Liten	Gopher
City of Evella	LDShadowLord
Konawa	Soleurs
Loudoun	DullesTdt
Royal Plaza	KevinTheLlama
Newton-le-Willows	Patrick44_LFC
Airchester	CortesiRaccoon
Mecklenburg	tarheelscouse
Kelvinside	Martii_Scots01
Haibian	cookiesareedible
Pearl Coast	knowmads7
Amestris	MRTKeikoku
Segville	godzilltrain
Spring Valley (O)	Architect_21
Helix Bay	TrainPro
Radiance Square	MindBender15
42	Leo_2807
Numark	bryce_am
New Covina	_Kastle
Scoton	MrDynamo_
Kolpino City	MishkaMan
Iconia	EchoRyuko
Avalon	Member_Me
Wolf Peak	bnsjninja
Wellington	JohnNotTech
Spruce Neck	Derpy_Melon	_Kastle
AEville	AEhub
Rochshire	MC_Protocol

Outcome: _Kastle will be the new Supreme Allied Commander, effective immediately.