Talk:United Cities Court

Promotions

camelfantasy and godzilltrain were both promoted to Governor during the voting of Resolutions 23, 24, and 25. I would like to litigate to see which council they should vote in. I argue for the General Assembly, and this has been pre-established by camel, however I would like to have a legal precedent. This is a formal complaint. Skelezomperman (talk) (contribs) (email) 19:12, 25 December 2016 (EST)

As the Security Council has been abolished there is no need to decide on this question of law.--Aliksong (talk) 01:37, 29 December 2016 (UTC)

I concur. Click here to see KittyCat11231's user page! Seriously. I dare you. 02:44, 29 December 2016 (UTC)

2017 Elections

Hello, I'm willing you not to allow _Kastle, mine_man, Cal67 and Narnia17 to run for the January 2017 elections. If you go on the Feline PAC page you'll find pictures telling people to vote "yes" on Canadian deportation and attacking canadian people, thus I think their ideas are too dangerous for the United Cities and the server. Even if they are supposed not to be serious we shouldn't agree with that. Yellowitcher, the only chamallow which became a witcher. (talk) 17:49, 31 December 2016 (UTC)

This claim is ridiculous. There is no legal argument to be made that a candidate can be invalidated because of their opinion or the opinion of any person endorsing them. This complaint is a mockery and abuse of the court system and I move to dismiss the claim immediately. Click here to see KittyCat11231's user page! Seriously. I dare you. 18:06, 31 December 2016 (UTC)

I also believe that there is no legal case against their opinions. InDev (talk) 01:32, 1 January 2017 (UTC)

The Court will not stop those individuals from running for office. First, Feline PAC's opinions do not affect the legitimacy of the 4 individuals from running. Even if such ideas were serious (although this is highly unlikely), such laws will have no effect as it discriminates against people on the basis of citizenship. This claim is dismissed.--Aliksong (talk) 04:16, 1 January 2017 (UTC)

Roads Comitee

I am hearby filing an complaint on my ejection from co-chairman of the roads comitee as I was put on said board by jphgolf4321 after Soleurs the previous chair of the committee left the UC. On 1/16/17 jph made an new board of the committee which I was not apart of replacing me with AP_Red a practice over which he had no power of. I have evidence currently of jph applied me to said committee's board on 12/27/16. --Ptld | "That is our Comment, We welcome Yours." ~Fred Nutter (talk) 19:26, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
I would like to counter Ptld's argument with my own. At the time at which I selected Ptld as a member of the committee, I had no legal basis for doing so under the Constitution. I was not given the authority to create committees on my own until the passage of Resolution 41 nearly a month later. Therefore, the committee to which Ptld claims he was appointed never legally existed until I legally formed it today. jphgolf4321 (talk) 19:48, 16 January 2017 (UTC)

I counter your counter Argument as you were adding onto a already created committee (see Resolution 3) which you were fixing as Soleurs left the UC you put 3 people on said board. --Ptld | "That is our Comment, We welcome Yours." ~Fred Nutter (talk) 19:52, 16 January 2017 (UTC)

Resolution 65

I would like to file a complaint over the voting on Resolution 65. The voting form clearly states that a "YEA" or a "NAY" vote is required, and those who have used any other terminology in the past have had their votes changed to the correct terms. There was one vote, a "YUP", in this vote, that was neither. Despite two attempts to replace this vote with the proper "YEA," the voter in question changed his vote back to a "YUP" each time. Because of this, I believe Resolution 65 should not have passed 12 YEA - 11 NAY and instead ended in an 11-11 tie (with the irregular vote thrown out) to be broken by vote of the Vice President. In addition I recuse myself from any court proceedings on this case and request that KittyCat11231 recuse himself as well seeing as he proposed the Resolution in question and vigorously campaigned for its passage. I would also hope to exclude anyone who voted on this resolution from the selection of replacement justices to avoid any possible conflict of interest. jphgolf4321 (talk) 23:05, 3 April 2017 (UTC)

Complaint

Filed by KittyCat11231 in his official capacity as Attorney General on behalf of the United Cities Department of Law.

As Attorney General, I am filing this complaint in concern over a certain irregularity in the resolution proposal process for Resolution 84.

The original version of this resolution was withdrawn and the resolution reset, with votes removed and the time limit adjusted, such that a revised version of the resolution could be proposed. This action has precedent on previous resolutions, specifically during jphgolf4321's term as President, however it is not clearly established whether it is legal to withdraw a resolution after it has been proposed, therefore I would like to litigate before the court to settle this issue and set a legal precedent.

Respectfully,
KittyCat11231
Attorney General of the United Cities

Under the 26th Amendment I take your case. The hearing is tentatively scheduled for 2100 UTC today pending word from one of the sponsors of Resolution 84.
Associate Justice Skelezomperman (talk) (contribs) (email) 20:16, 1 May 2017 (UTC)

Another Stupid Complaint

FIled by PtldKnight

Recently it has come to attention that most UC Members are in violation of the Consititution Sections 1.1.2 and 1.1.3 as they are States and not City States. I would like the court to decide the importance and necessity of this rule to exist.

PtldKnight

Representative of the State of Waterville

Ben Nation

Filed by KittyCat11231 in his official capacity as Attorney General of the United Cities.

Ben6331, the former President of Ben Nation, has been banned, and therefore Ben Nation's leadership is in question. FoxFury1010 is the listed Vice President of Ben Nation, however EliteNeon has claimed ownership of Ben Nation. I request the court hear the case over Ben Nation's future in the United Cities, and issue a preliminary injunction, as allowed by Amendment 44, to suspend Ben Nation from voting in the General Assembly until the court's final decision is made.

Respectfully,
KittyCat11231
Attorney General of the United Cities

This case has been withdrawn by the Attorney General. Click here to see KittyCat11231's user page! Seriously. I dare you. 02:17, 6 June 2017 (UTC)

City States and States

Filed by VernCow

Ever since the UC was formed.. City States and States have no difference at all in terms of voting power and their presence in the UC, therefore, it isn't needed nor necessary that the UC to seperate the 2 .. Therefore, I request that the court decide to rule both entities as one with the same calling name.

Respectfully
VernCow
Member of the UC

Complaint

Filed by KittyCat11231 in his official capacity as Attorney General of the United Cities.

This complaint is related to an irregularity in the voting procedure for Resolution 102. During the vote for the resolution, General Assembly member CaptainChimpy cast Nay votes on behalf of both AlikSong and BuiltPilot, without known evidence that either member consented to CaptainChimpy voting on their behalf. I request that the court compel CaptainChimpy to release evidence that both candidates consented to a Nay vote on their behalf, and that should CaptainChimpy fail to present such evidence, the Court order each vote to be null and void.

Respectfully,
KittyCat11231
Attorney General of the United Cities

From the Office of the Director of Party Programme of the MRT International coalition.

There has been much speculation growing about CaptainChimpy's decision to use AlikSong's and BuildPilot's vote in the decisive Resolution 102. As such, I have removed these votes, and they should not be counted with 102.

At this time I can neither confirm nor deny that the proxy vote was indeed given. To this end, an internal investigation will be opened by myself into CaptainChimpy, and one other player, not named at this time, to discover what happened. As CaptainChimpy would normally oversee such investigations, I will personally oversee this investigation to ensure the truth is uncovered.

A quick search for evidence discovered that none existed at this time. Part of the investigation will look to uncover this evidence, but also speak to BuildPilot and AlikSong.

We also request that this case is dismissed, as we have taken necessary internal action and removed the offending votes. This will allow the internal investigation to take place unhindered.

Best wishes,

DJMC2000

I request that this Court complaint be withdrawn.--Aliksong (talk) 12:15, 16 June 2017 (UTC)

I announce my immediate leave from the United Cities. I apologise to Alik, to Build, to Ardy and to DJMC for my failings in leadership. Please take this as an admission of guilt so you can finish the case quickly.

Thank you, Chimpeh - Gimmeh da bananas now! :D (talk) 15:57, 18 June 2017 (UTC)

Apology accepted Chimpeh. As I requested above, I request that this Court case be withdrawn. For the record I will not be cooperating with any hearing that may arise. Of course I am disappointed that my vote was changed from YEA to NAY but there is no need to blow this issue out of proportion. As one of the people actually affected by this, I will find it disrespectful if my name is used in the prosecution's case from this point forward. --Aliksong (talk) 21:43, 18 June 2017 (UTC)

EDIT: Didn't see the Court's decision at the time of writing the above. Case closed. --Aliksong (talk) 21:45, 18 June 2017 (UTC)

Complaint

Filed by KittyCat11231 in his official capacity as Attorney General of the United Cities.

I am filing this complaint with regards to CaptainChimpy's membership in the United Cities. CaptainChimpy left the United Cities on June 18th, and while he has since rejoined the Discord server, he has not added himself to the official membership list of the United Cities. I would like the Court to settle the issue of whether CaptainChimpy has been a legal member of the United Cities, and by extension, whether his vote in the United Cities election is valid.

I request the Court issue a preliminary injunction enjoining the Electoral Commission from certifying the result of the July 2017 election until this case is resolved.

Respectfully,
KittyCat11231
Attorney General of the United Cities

I hereby withdraw this complaint. Click here to see KittyCat11231's user page! Seriously. I dare you. 01:29, 25 July 2017 (UTC)

Complaint

I am filing this complaint in concordance of Amendment 79 in regards to the downtime caused by OVH's network at approximately 7:20am GMT + 0:00. Because of this downtime, no mrt services except discord could be accessed by members of the United Cities, including the wiki. In regards to this, I am requesting the United Cities Court rounds the voting period for Resolution 195 to 1/15/2018 @ 5:22AM GMT. mine_man_ - Attorney General