Difference between revisions of "United Cities/Resolutions"
(YEA on 129. This was a tough decision, as I don't necessarily like the idea of officers picking favorites with other officers, thereby bringing politics into court operations, but given the small size of this organization, such a problem is negated.)
(→Resolution 129: Presidential Inclusion for Associate Justice Nominations Act: I agree with MJP.)
|Line 22:||Line 22:|
Revision as of 16:38, 11 August 2017
|Main Page | Constitution | Current Resolutions | Past Resolutions | Enacted Resolutions | Passed Motions | Executive Actions | Elections|
|State Department | Law Department | Enforcement Department | Court|
|Transit | History | Public Works | Electoral Commission | Former Committees | Building Guide|
This page is the voting platform for the United Cities. On it will be listed resolutions up for voting. Finished resolutions and their voting records will be moved to an archive page.
IMPORTANT: All votes must be formatted as either YEA or NAY in the voting table. Votes not in this format will be discarded.
Resolution 129: Presidential Inclusion for Associate Justice Nominations Act
Proposed by camelfantasy with presidential exemption.
This resolution is a constitutional amendment.
Upon passage of this resolution, the President will be enabled to vote on Associate Justice nominations as if they were a member of the General Assembly. This shall only apply to nominations put up for voting after the passage of this resolution.