Mrt-logo.png

The wiki has now been upgraded to MediaWiki 1.31.1 with many new extensions and improvements. For a full list of changes, please see the Wiki Upgrade 2018 page.
In other news, the next GSM will occur on November 3. Topics must be submitted to staff@ by 7pm UTC on November 1.

Mrt-logo.png

User talk:Autobus

From Minecart Rapid Transit Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search

Hello iam autobus22.

ABC AutoBusCompanys

All I need to do for IB07 is set warps, which I shall do today. KittyCat11231 - THE LLAMAS ARE COMING!!! Though they're stuck in traffic on the NJ Turnpike so give them time. (talk)!

IB07 is complete! KittyCat11231 - THE LLAMAS ARE COMING!!! Though they're stuck in traffic on the NJ Turnpike so give them time. (talk) 11:06, 6 July 2014 (EDT)
Thank you ~ãutobus22

Auto did you give Air Northern permission to fly your TU154? -Elite

Air northern has paid for use of the TU154 and Fokker 27. Autobus (talk) 09:18, 6 August 2016 (EDT)

RegiolinQ to Kenthurst

Hallo auto,

I noticed you wanted to set up a rail link between Laclede, Whitechapel and Kenthurst.

I have platforms in my Kenthurst South Railway Station (Transit Hub) to facilitate this, with possibilities of extending the line further south/south east/ south west.

However the line would need to be built under my city to get to the Kenthurst South Railway Station since it is coming in from the north.

Let me know what you think :) --Aliksong (talk) 21:46, 11 June 2015 (EDT)

2 issues with that, 1. I use warptrains, that won't fit on any regular redstone station. (wich you can find in the intro of the wiki page too.) 2. Iam nowhere near creating that line just yet. iam first focussing on issues with warps dissapearing and finishing the first backbone intercity line. Autobus (talk) 09:58, 12 June 2015 (EDT)

Please don't mark pages for deletion

That template is for you to request your own pages be deleted. It is not your job to mark other people's pages (which they put effort into) for deletion. If you object to a page, leave a message on the talk page. KittyCat11231 is behind you right now. Look. I dare you. (talk) 11:51, 4 August 2015 (EDT)

This is the very purpose of the deletion tag, if a wiki page seems useless, and in this case a clone in different words, its essentially a doubble post. Its marked for deletion and objections to it can be given in the talk page of the respective page, according to the rules of the template. ~autobus22.
I'm kind of with kitty here. If your going to mark a page for deletion, please speak to the creator of the page or make a new thread on the talk page before automatically marking it for deletion. This prevents editing wars like what is happening right now. Mineman4604 (talk) 18:08, 4 August 2015 (EDT)
Auto, do not start an editing war with me. You don't get to decide whether a page is worthy of existing. If you have a problem, leave a message on the talk page or ask a mod. KittyCat11231 is behind you right now. Look. I dare you. (talk) 18:27, 4 August 2015 (EDT)
Hello all. Auto, you do not have the right to mark that page for deletion. It may be a replication, but please ask on the talk page before doing that, as it was a different person who created the page. Also, don't start an edit war, and discuss on the talk page before redoing your edit. I am speaking as a staff member now, so please do not revert your edit. In future, I say again, use the talk page to avoid controversy, which if continued could result as a warning on your ingame account. You are free to question what I have said, but I can't guarantee I will change my mind. Thanks! hnt (talk) 18:33, 4 August 2015 (EDT)
Han here. As a former editor of the actual Wikipedia, it is true that according to them (presuming that MRT Wiki has a different guideline), it is acceptable to mark a page for deletion not by the actual editor him or herself. However, it is considered very inconsiderate to mark a page for deletion when the page is 1) Fulfilled in an adequate amount, and 2) Has a point in which differs from any other pages. And Auto, what you claim of The Round Records Company is the same thing as Round Records is not true, as you can probably sense, the first page is the Company link, whereas the second page directs as the store (RRstore) page. Please take note and do not place deletion links on the pages that isn't created by you, in which Kitty, Hnt, and Mineman along with me say; this is a consensual decision.
HanSangYoon 19:41, 4 August 2015 (EDT)

Name change for Kenthurst warp train station

Hi auto, Kenthurst South Station has been renamed Kenthurst Xenonite Station. I did not want to change it on th RailLinQ page without your permission. Thanks! --Aliksong (talk) 19:21, 17 December 2015 (EST)

I am unsure when and how ill come into kenthurst, our promise was an overground terminus single platform station, now _Frozen assigned me an underground area in the station. Autobus (talk) 19:27, 17 December 2015 (EST)ab22
We can maybe sort out an overground terminus, I will look at the configuration. --Aliksong (talk) 20:15, 17 December 2015 (EST)

Wiki page creation

Hey auto, Instead of creating wiki pages for each of your bus and tram lines why not just compile them into one or two wiki pages 1 page for all transit or one for bus and one for tram. That is up to you how you decide to organize but creating a bunch of separate dirt quality pages is unnecessary.BestMIKE24Dude (talk) 17:11, 18 July 2016 (EDT)

I want to be able to provide seperate and accurate information for each line, I tried bundling them and it created a horrible mess of a wiki page. I did change formatting since then, I'll see what I will do later when I will be working on the page again. *By the mess, I mean have you seen the page for all transport in Nippia, you can barely make out anything. The RegioLinQ page was about to turn into that. hence the 2 very seperate units, RaiLinQ and AirLinQ have their complete own pages. Doing a seperate page for each bus and tram line might have been a bit overkill. Autobus (talk) 17:22, 18 July 2016 (EDT)

Date Wrong

I think you have your date wrong for your join date cause that means you joined before the server opened... MinecraftYoshi26 (talk) 19:56, 19 October 2016 (EDT)

Woops, mistyped the year, should've been 2013.

RailLinQ Route

Hey auto, remember how we talked about the rail line and you said Ashmore would take a while to get sen, well it has senator perks, I'm in an SMp with it. It can have as many rail lines as it wants, :) D e r p y _ M e l o n 20:01, 22 November 2016 (EST)

Thank you for notifying meAutobus (talk) 20:13, 22 November 2016 (EST)

RaiLinQ to Mississa Bay (XW11) and Kenthurst Xenonite Station

Hi Auto,

I’ve read through your RailLinq page and was wondering if you’d be interested in extending the lines presently terminating at Ezzo City to Mississa Bay.

I have removed the enormous GM motors building to the south west of Kenthurst (because it didn’t look right) and am planning on using the land for heavy rail lines and an extension of the boat race canal.

Alik

How did you manage to say this right when I was looking up train length to start construction at the station at Ezzo City? Anyway, No. I'd prefer to keep the triple terminus at Ezzo City. It's got nothing to do with whether Mississa Bay would or wouldn't be a great location, But I'll decline for 3 main reasons.
- Ezzo City is a more convenient spot for such a station from a timetabling and planning standpoint.
- Realism, If you look at spheres of influence it is reasonable to expect there to be a commuter zone between Ezzo City and Kenthurst, I don't want to add an exchange in the middle of that route.
- Ezzo City Station Size: Rather Ironically, I'd have to add 2 extra tracks at Ezzo City station to allow me to move the hub, because it'd require a passing point for the lines from Moton and Daneburg to be installed there, rather then a single terminus.
However, if you end up constructing a warptrain station in the south of Mississa Bay, I'd be more then glad to link it up with a Shuttle Train Service, Similarly to the service between Ilirea West and Ilirea Cascadia, from Ezzo City. There is space in the current plans to add an extra train to operate this shuttle service with. Just a bus on the line 22 near you! (talk) 09:14, 8 May 2018 (UTC)
Hey auto, that’s fine, completely up to you. I do note that there are limited transport connections between Ezzo City and Kenthurst. XW9 to XW11 falls under the city of Kenthurst and within these stations, there are good transport connections. Ezzo City is a separate town to Kenthurst. I guess my main question is why is Ezzo City a terminus? --Aliksong (talk) 09:43, 8 May 2018 (UTC)
It became a terminus because it used to only be planned to be served by one line, the line from Utopia. I considered terminating that at Kenthurst when I realised a line from Moton would have to connect up to it, but then in timetabling the current solution with a terminal at Ezzo City worked better and would make it possible to keep serving Ezzo City <> Kenthurst/Kenthurst Airport without having to exchange. The Line from Daneburg Harbour was added to the plans later and tied into the existing now double terminus plans there. Ezzo City also is the point BTRail sleepers enter the main area of the RaiLinQ network so I needed infrastructure (And a platform) for that as well (Full size BTRail sleeper btw, is 181 blocks long), meaning it's convenient for me to put that all at the junction point there. Just a bus on the line 22 near you! (talk) 09:53, 8 May 2018 (UTC)